曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
Previously, DoD has tended toward multi-mission configurations where one platform would accomplish both/many missions (e.g., the multi-mission platform). It should be noted that a UA designed to be cost effective for both lightly and heavily defended targets would be of sufficient size that it would no longer be a low cost solution. A trade analysis would be required to determine if one multi-mission UA should be procured, or if a range of separate UA for each mission is a better value.
If a UA are to reduce the numbers of manned strike assets required, it will have to offer a weapons compatibility mix similar to that of manned strike assets in order to keep overall armament development and support costs low. Additionally, UA must be examined for every opportunity to further reduce operations and support costs. Operational data is available for many UA as a result of OEF and OIF. Analysis is required to determine where savings can be achieved, or how they could be achieved if proper Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel and Facilities (DOTMLPF) is applied. J-UCAS should conduct such an analysis as part of its Operational Assessment to ensure the program implements these lessons learned during its system development and demonstration phase.
SEAD may be analyzed as two different types of missions. The first is pre-emptive SEAD, in which a pathway is cleared prior to the ingress of strike aircraft. The other type is reactive SEAD, in which the SEAD asset must react rapidly to “pop-up” enemy air defense threats during the execution of a strike. Since closing with that threat will be required, the survivability of the vehicle must be assured through a combination of speed, stealth technology, and/or high maneuverability.
Execution of both the pre-emptive and the reactive SEAD mission imply several critical design criteria for the UA platform and mission control system. These attributes would be similar to those of a UA in a strike roll against heavily defended targets. UA accomplishing pre-emptive SEAD missions would also be expected to possess the following system characteristics:
. Extremely high mission reliability, as follow-on force assets (many of which will be manned) will depend upon the protection of a SEAD UA asset.
APPENDIX A – MISSIONS
Page A-5
.
Battle damage assessment (BDA) so operational commanders can properly determine whether strike “go/no-go/continue” criteria have been met.
.
If BDA is organic this reduces the reliance on other systems outside the SEAD UA platform, but puts other design requirements on the SEAD UA that complicate signature control.
.
If BDA is not organic then this simplifies the SEAD UA design requirements, but complicates the integration of other ISR capabilities as a family of systems attempting to achieve effect in the SEAD mission.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：无人机系统路线图 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap(89)
