.
Assessing short term and long term consequences on the flight;
.
Evaluating available options and procedures;
.
Deciding the course of actions;
.
Taking actions in accordance with the defined procedures and applicable task-sharing;
.
Evaluating and monitoring action results; and,
.
Resuming standard flying duties.
Postponing a decision until that option is no more considered or no longer available is a recurring pattern in approach-and-landing accidents.
The concepts of next-target and approach-gate are intended to act as benchmarks for supporting a timely decision-making process.
CRM Issues in Approach and Landing Accidents
Page 3
AIRBUS INDUSTRIE Getting to Grips with
Flight Operations Support Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reduction
Other CRM Aspects Summary of Key Points
The following CRM aspects may be involved in CRM practices optimize the performance of the approach-and-landing incidents or accidents: entire crew (i.e., including flight crew and cabin
.
Spatial disorientation (i.e., physiological illusions and/or visual illusions);
.
Complacency when operating at a familiar airport (e.g., home base); or,
.
Overconfidence (e.g., high time on aircraft type);
.
Inadequate anticipation (i.e., inability to “ stay ahead of the aircraft “);
.
Inadequate preparation to respond to changing situations or to an abnormal / emergency condition, by precise planning and use of all available technical and human resources (i.e., by “ expecting the unexpected “);
.
Crewmembers personal factors; and/or,
.
Absence of specific training of instructors and check airmen to evaluate the CRM performance of trainees and line pilots.
Factors Affecting CRM Practice
The following organizational or personal factors may adversely affect the effective implementation of CRM practices:
.
Company culture and policies;
.
Belief that actions or decisions are correct, although they deviates from the applicable standards;
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:Getting to Grips with Approach-and-Landing Accidents Reducti(59)