曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
holdshort.alpa.org.
Thank you for your continued interest in maintaining runway safety.
In our next issue of Runway Risks, we will focus on the impact of
runway contamination on surface braking coefficient. Please contact
us at runway-safety@alpa.org with your concerns.
Ensuring a safe landing requires
achieving a balanced distribution of
safety margins between:
»» the computed final approach speed
(also called the target threshold
speed) and
»» the resulting landing distance.
The Flight Safety Foundation (FSF)
Approach-and-Landing Accident
Reduction (ALAR) Task Force found
that “high energy” approaches were
a causal factor in 30 percent of 76
approach-and-landing accidents
Flight Safety Foundation (FSF)
Approach Hazards
Overview – Section 8.2
and serious incidents worldwide in 1984
through 1997.
Factors affecting the final approach speed
“usually are not cumulative”; only the highest
airspeed correction should be added to VREF
(unless otherwise stated in the AOM/QRH):
»» Airspeed correction for wind
»» Airspeed correction for ice accretion
»» Airspeed correction for autothrottle
speed mode or autoland; or
»» Airspeed correction for forecast turbulence/
wind shear conditions.
While our main goal of
distributing this newsletter
is to increase your education
and awareness of runway safety
hazards, ALPA is also committed
to providing access to educational
resources on our website. In
addition, we strive to:
1. immediately provide you with
awareness tools,
2. conduct this educational
campaign to provide
information to line pilots,
3. continue the pursuit of longterm
system mitigations of
runway safety hazards.
Through personal experience, many pilots have learned or
developed their own best practices for safe operations. If you have
a suggestion regarding safe operating procedures in the airport
environment, please share it with us by clicking on the button below.
All suggestions will be reviewed and considered for publication in
subsequent newsletters.
Thank you for your contribution.
Do you have a best practices
recommendation for safe
airport operations?
FLY SAFELY!
O u r G o a l s
® Simpler
Tool
Beliefs Techniques
© 1996-2008 Simpler Business System® 11.0
© Simpler Consulting, Inc 1996-2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
For the Express Use of Simpler Members Only
Successfully Applying Lean in
a Repair and Overhaul
Environment
Nick Middleton - President APAC
16th October 2008
® Simpler
Tool
Beliefs Techniques
© 1996-2008 Simpler Business System® 11.0
© Simpler Consulting, Inc 1996-2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
For the Express Use of Simpler Members Only
Royal Air Force - Harrier Before
After
Figures from National Audit Office report – July 2007
Improvements between
Maintenance spend
Cost per flying hour
Engine turnaround time
Time taken for minor service
Additional serviceable aircraft available - 11
Cumulative savings - £109m
Reduction in floor space 20,000 sq feet (4 empty buildings)
2001/2
£110m
£7500
277 days
120 days
2006/7
£70m
£4500
94 days
63 days
After
® Simpler
Tool
Beliefs Techniques
© 1996-2008 Simpler Business System® 11.0
© Simpler Consulting, Inc 1996-2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
For the Express Use of Simpler Members Only
June 2002
No Flow
Excess Work in
Process
8 Teams
Visual Management
No Corrective Action
® Simpler
Tool
Beliefs Techniques
© 1996-2008 Simpler Business System® 11.0
© Simpler Consulting, Inc 1996-2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
For the Express Use of Simpler Members Only
® Simpler
Tool
Beliefs Techniques
© 1996-2008 Simpler Business System® 11.0
© Simpler Consulting, Inc 1996-2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
For the Express Use of Simpler Members Only
Shannon Aerospace
2 years focused on MRO of
Boeing and Airbus Product Family types
Benefits:
• 30% Reduction in Turn Round Time
• 35% Reduction in Manual Cycle Time
• 35% Reduction in Costs
Before
After
® Simpler
Tool
Beliefs Techniques
© 1996-2008 Simpler Business System® 11.0
© Simpler Consulting, Inc 1996-2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
航空资料35(183)
