European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions(12)

◆
WP 091, Runway Safety with focus on prevention of runway incursion,

◆
WP 092, Safety Management System, a practical initial approach,

◆
WP 093, GASR Guidelines to Safety Assessment

◆
WP 094, GASR Model Aerodrome Audit Report Template

IATA MATERIAL
◆ IATA Airport Handling Manual (AHM) current edition

JAA MATERIAL
◆
JAA WEBSITE: www.jaa.nl

◆
ATC Data Link (ARINC 623-1) (Awaiting approval)

◆
JAR 66 (certifying staff)

◆
JAA TGL 9 Recognition of ED76 (RTCA DO-200A) Standards for Processing Aeronautical Data

◆
JAR FCL

◆
JAR OPS

TRANSPORT CANADA
◆
TRANSPORT CANADA WEBSITE: www.tc.gc.ca

◆
TRANSPORT CANADA FINAL REPORT from Sub-Committee on

◆
Runway Incursions (September 14, 2000)

◆
Runway Incursion Study at NAV CANADA ATS facilities (February 2001)

MISCELLANEOUS
◆
UK Civil Aviation Authority CAP 642 - Airside Safety Management

◆
UK Airport Operators Association - Airside Driver Training Scheme

◆
University of Leiden, Human Factors in runway incursion incidents, Patrick Hudson

USEFUL WEB SITES
www.airports.org www.aci-europe.org www.caa.co.uk www.eurocontrol.int www.faarsp.org/ www.iata.org www.jaa.nl www.tc.ca

Appendix B. Communications Guidance

Best Practices
In many investigation reports, and from surveys regarding runway safety occurrences it is apparent that communications issues are frequently a causal or contributory factor.
The demanding environment associated with aerodrome operations on a runway require that all participants accurately receive, understand, and correctly read back all the clearances and instructions being transmitted. Whilst this readback requirement is not an ICAO mandatory requirement for drivers, it is however considered Best Practice to apply it.
At times, the volume, speed of delivery, and complexity of these RTF instructions can impose difficulty on the Controllers, Vehicle Drivers and/or Flight Crew, especially when the language in use is not the native language of the participants.
Use of Aviation English is proven to be a significant factor in the establishment and maintenance of situation awareness for all participants associated with runway operations. To be effective, a limited set of phraseologies (15 – 20) could be identified for vehicle drivers. Although a minimum skill level requirement for language proficiency had been proposed by ICAO in State Letter AN 13/48.1-02/1 on 31st May 2002, it is important that a more hazardous situation is not created by implementing this recommendation prior to the minimum skill level being achieved. For this recommendation no implementation date will be attached, as due to the many factors associated with this issue it is considered that only ICAO can propose implementation of this action. Although important, this recommendation will not apply until a start date is mandated by ICAO.
　
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions(12)