曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to
in Article 5(4).
5. The establishment of the performance scheme shall take into account that en route
services, terminal services and network functions are different and should be treated
accordingly, if necessary also for performance-measuring purposes.
6. For the detailed functioning of the performance scheme, the Commission shall, by
4 December 2011, and within a suitable time frame with a view to meeting the relevant
deadlines laid down in this Regulation, adopt implementing rules in accordance with the
regulatory procedure referred to in Article 5(3). These implementing rules shall cover the
following:
(a) the content and timetable of the procedures referred to in paragraph 4;
121
(b) the reference period and intervals for the assessment of the achievement of
performance targets and setting of new targets;
(c) criteria for the setting up by the national supervisory authorities of the national or
functional airspace block performance plans, containing the national or functional
airspace block performance targets and the incentive scheme. The performance
plans shall:
(i) be based on the business plans of the air navigation service providers;
(ii) address all cost components of the national or functional airspace block
cost base;
(iii) include binding performance targets consistent with the Community-wide
performance targets;
(d) criteria to assess whether the national or functional airspace block targets are
consistent with the Community-wide performance targets during the reference
period and to support alert mechanisms;
(e) general principles for the setting up by Member States of the incentive scheme;
(f) principles for the application of a transitional mechanism necessary for the
adaptation to the functioning of the performance scheme not exceeding
12 months following the adoption of the implementing rules.
122
ANNEX II - FRAMEWORK FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The figure below shows the principal measures of traffic and their relationships, as well as
corresponding indicators.
RPK
(Revenue pax-km)
ASK
(Available seat-km)
Flight distance
(km)
Flight-hours
(h)
Flights
(N)
Load factor (%)
Average aircraft
seat capacity
Average speed
(km/h)
Average flight
duration (h)
Average length
(km)
Max. Take-Off
Weight (t)
Framework for traffic analysis
The societal end result of air transport measured in Revenue Passenger Kilometres (RPK) results
from a combination of factors:
the average flight length reflects the average distance between origins and
destinations of flights in the network (not of passenger journeys)
average aircraft seating capacity, it is related to Maximum Take-Off Weight
(MTOW);
load factors
123
ANNEX III - ACC TRAFFIC AND DELAY DATA (2006-2009)
State ACC Name
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
Albania Tirana 327 389 405 442 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0% 0% 0% 0%
Armenia Yerevan 119 0.0 0%
Austria Wien 1897 2072 2108 1976 1.1 1.4 2.1 1.6 73% 44% 35% 25%
Belgium Brussels 1630 1630 1606 1470 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 73% 76% 69% 58%
Bosnia-Herzegovina Sarajevo 2 2 3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0%
Bulgaria Sofia 619 705 1187 1230 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 49% 0%
Bulgaria Varna 434 458 344 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0%
Croatia Zagreb 829 974 1039 1063 1.6 0.8 2.1 0.7 1% 5% 0% 0%
Cyprus Nicosia 590 660 739 729 0.8 1.6 2.7 2.4 1% 5% 3% 2%
Czech Republic Praha 1597 1690 1782 1707 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.3 18% 14% 11% 12%
Denmark Kobenhavn 1429 1493 1456 1354 0.6 0.3 2.6 0.1 41% 61% 13% 74%
Estonia Tallinn 332 386 433 401 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0%
Finland Rovaniemi 96 92 92 92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0%
Finland Tampere 475 460 474 444 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 70% 83% 97% 55%
France Bordeaux 2178 2313 2324 2121 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 16% 11% 21% 29%
France Brest 2320 2490 2460 2248 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 1% 2% 1% 1%
France Marseille AC 2659 2868 2867 2692 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0% 0% 0% 0%
France Paris 3357 3476 3449 3265 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.7 67% 49% 48% 71%
France Reims 2305 2450 2457 2174 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.1 1% 2% 0% 6%
FYROM Skopje 315 330 336 337 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0%
Germany Berlin 913 0.4 42%
Germany Bremen 1001 1741 1762 1623 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 75% 68% 42% 42%
Germany Langen 3504 3596 3577 3363 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.3 88% 87% 75% 53%
Germany Munchen 3521 3914 4021 3780 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 60% 55% 50% 53%
Germany Rhein 3709 3921 4012 3744 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.6 0% 0% 0% 0%
Greece Athinai+Macedonia 1492 1642 1699 1693 0.8 1.4 2.2 2.2 78% 59% 32% 47%
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Performance Review Report 2009(87)
