曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
the Enlarged Committee for Route Charges can differ from the charges collected from en-route airspace users.
For comparability purposes, Figure 109 shows the en-route costs charged to UK airspace users. These costs are
computed as the product of the chargeable service units with the UK unit rate expressed in £. Planned costs are
converted into Euros using the planned exchange rates provided by UK in their submission to the Enlarged
Committee for Route Charges. Unit costs are obtained by division of these costs with the chargeable km.
PRR 2009 95 Chapter 8: Cost-effectiveness
between 2004 and 2008 are analysed in Section 8.7 below.
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Spain Canarias Spain Continental United Kingdom Italy Germany France
Euro 2008 / km
Unit costs planned in Nov. 2008 Actual unit costs Unit costs planned in Nov. 2009
Figure 109: Trend in en-route ANS real unit costs for the five largest States (2004-2013) in
€2008
8.4.6 Figure 109 indicates that, except for Italy, all the largest States en-route unit costs are
planned to increase in 2009. This is particularly the case in Germany (+16%), France
(+13%), Spain Canarias (+13%) and Spain Continental (+9%).
8.4.7 The unit costs forward-looking profile provided by all the five largest States in November
2009 (see blue dotted line in Figure 109) were revised upwards especially for the years
2009 and 2010. In order to understand the drivers for differences in planned profiles,
Figure 110 above compares the costs and traffic planned by the five largest States for the
purposes of the Enlarged Committee meeting in November 2009 with the plans provided
in November 2008.
8.4.8 Figure 110 clearly indicates that all the largest States anticipated the impact of the
economic downturn on the traffic growth by adjusting their traffic forecast downwards in
November 2009 (orange bars below the orange line). In November 2009, Spain
significantly revised downwards its planned traffic volumes (i.e. around -20% for the
period 2009-201340) reflecting the fact that the traffic forecast used in November 2008
was over estimated, due to a decision taken in support of airspace users to maintain the
unit rate in 2009 according to the data presented to the June 2008 Enlarged Committee41.
All else being equal, this over-estimation of the traffic forecast will result in underrecoveries
to be borne by airspace users in future years.
8.4.9 Figure 110 also indicates that for France, Germany, Spain Canarias and, to a lesser extent,
the UK, 2008 actual costs were lower than the plans made in November 2008. This is
undoubtedly the sign of tighter cost control in these States.
40 Note that Spain presented a new traffic forecast in the context of the March 2009 Enlarged Committee session.
This new profile was significantly lower than the planned data provided in November 2008. As a result,
compared to the forecasts made in March 2009, planned traffic volumes have been revised downwards in
November 2009 by some -10% for the period 2009-2013.
41 As referred in the Action Paper provided by the Spanish Ministerio de Fomento for the purposes of the Enlarged
Committee for Route Charges (CE-R, March 2009).
PRR 2009 96 Chapter 8: Cost-effectiveness
-3% -10% -13% -14% -16%
0%
-20% -24% -26% -28% -29%
-7%
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
En-route national costs
(M€2008)
0
500
1 000
1 500
Kilometres (M)
Costs planned in Nov. 2008 Costs planned in Nov. 2009
Traffic planned in Nov. 2008 Traffic planned in Nov. 2009
Spain Continental
-5% -9% -13% -16% -17% -18%
-6%
-24% -28% -30% -31% -33%
50
100
150
200
250
300
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
En-route national costs
(M€2008)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Kilometres (M)
Costs planned in Nov. 2008 Costs planned in Nov. 2009
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Performance Review Report 2009(70)
