曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
principle”.
The ANS system response to the drop in traffic shows the limitations of the current ANS funding system.
Significant under-recoveries generated in 2008 and 2009 will have to be borne by airspace users in future
years, resulting in an increase of the unit rates in a time when the industry starts to recover.
In the context of the SES II performance scheme, the EC is developing implementing rules which require the
setting of binding national/FAB performance targets in four performance areas (Safety, Cost-effectiveness,
Capacity, Environment) and the introduction of corresponding incentive schemes.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PRR 2009
x
The first reference period of the SES II performance scheme starting in 2012 will mark a significant change
for European ANS performance and it is important to ensure the development of sound and relevant key
indicators which serve as a foundation for target setting.
The incentivisation of ANS performance would need to be linked to a mechanism which balances the risks
between States/ANSPs and airspace users. ANSPs should be allowed to build up financial reserves when they
perform well (service quality, cost efficiency) but should have to bear a risk when traffic falls below planned
levels or when their costs are above pre-determined levels.
Despite the unprecedented drop in traffic and the resulting need to contain costs, adequate and pro-active
capacity planning at local and ATM network level is essential to continue to close existing capacity gaps and
to be able to cope with future traffic demand while managing all the planned ATM system upgrades without
excessive and costly service quality penalties.
A proactive capacity planning and management is especially important considering the fact that structural
decisions concerning capacity (recruitment, investment, major airspace redesign, and operational agreements
within FABs) typically have an operational effect after 3-5 years.
In this context, the setting of binding capacity performance targets as part of the SES performance scheme will
need to be supported by locally drawn up performance plans and a reinforced network management function
to be established within the Single European Sky initiative.
Recommendations
The Provisional Council is invited to:
a. note the PRC’s Performance Review Report (PRR 2009) and to submit it to the Permanent Commission;
b. request States and ANSPs whose maturity level is below 70% to urgently resolve the related issues and
to request the Director General to support them as appropriate;
c. request States and Air Navigation Service Providers to implement “just culture” where this is not
already the case;
d. encourage States and ANSPs to use automatic detection and reporting tools and to further improve the
transparency of ANS safety;
e. note the importance of a balanced approach to performance: increases in en-route delays over the period
2003-2008 nearly cancelled out the benefits of improvements in cost-effectiveness;
f. urge the ANSPs concerned to resolve urgently the issues leading to high delays in the top 30 delaygenerating
sectors, and to request the Director General to assist them in this respect;
g. urge ANSPs, given the severe economic downturn, to effectively implement the planned costcontainment
measures so that:
i. they materialise into genuine cost-savings for airspace users in the cost bases for 2010 and
subsequent years and that;
ii. they contribute to improving the total economic cost of ANS and do not compromise the provision
of future ATC capacity;
h. urge:
i. States, ANSPs, airspace users and the Agency to further improve the design and use of airspace for
both civil and military needs, and
ii. ANSPs and airlines to make more effective use of airspace released to civil operations;
i. encourage airport stakeholders (Airport operators, coordinators, ANS providers and airlines) to
constructively engage in the PRC-led process of development of indicators and targets addressing
operational performance at and around airports and in the building of a comprehensive and reliable data
base that can adequately support it.
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... I
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................III
TRAFFIC.....................................................................................................................................................III
SAFETY ......................................................................................................................................................III
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Performance Review Report 2009(8)
