曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
However, actual 2009 traffic data shows that the decrease in traffic volumes was worse
than planned by the States which means that if actual 2009 costs are not revised
downwards, the en-route unit costs increase in 2009 will be much higher than indicated in
Figure 104.
8.2.7 This is definitively a more pessimistic outlook than in November 2008 plans where enroute
unit costs were planned to remain constant between 2008 and 2009 as shown in
Figure 105.
+9.5% +9.3%
+6.5% +7.1% +9.3%
-0.4%
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
2008A 2009P 2010P 2011P 2012P 2013P
€ 2008 per km
Unit Costs planned in Nov. 2008 Unit Costs planned in Nov. 2009
-2.1% -2.1% -1.9%
-3.6%
-1.1%
-2.1%
-10.4% -10.6% -10.3%
-7.2% -10.0%
-1.7%
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
2008 2009P 2010P 2011P 2012P 2013P
En-route national costs
(M€2008)
7 000
9 000
11 000
13 000
15 000
Kilometres (M)
Costs planned in Nov. 2008 Costs planned in Nov. 2009
Traffic planned in Nov. 2008 Traffic planned in Nov. 2009
Figure 105: Comparison of real en-route unit costs (data planned in Nov ‘08 & Nov ‘09)
PRR 2009 90 Chapter 8: Cost-effectiveness
8.2.8 The chart displayed on the left-hand side of Figure 105 shows the percentage changes
between the unit costs planned in November 2008 and the information provided in
November 2009. Compared to November 2008 plans, the unit cost profile for 2009-2013
has been revised upwards by some 7-9%.
8.2.9 The chart on the right-hand side of Figure 105 shows that compared to November 2008
plans, the traffic projected for 2009 onwards has been significantly revised downwards by
some 7-10% (red bars) reflecting the current economic downturn. This is the main driver
for the change in the unit costs profile between November 2008 and November 2009. On
the other hand, the right-hand side of Figure 105 indicates that compared to November
2008 plans, the costs projected for 2009 onwards have been revised downwards by a
much smaller magnitude (blue bars), for example -1.1% for 2009 and -3.6% for 2010.
Each percentage reduction of the en-route cost-base amounts to some €70M.
8.2.10 Undoubtedly, the recent economic downturn is having a significant impact on the aviation
industry and in particular on airspace users which are subject to strong commercial costs
pressures and are forced to promptly cut costs in order to preserve their financial viability.
In those circumstances, several European ANSPs are also implementing short-term and
medium term cost-containment measures so that the loss of revenues due to the traffic
shortfall do not automatically translate into an increase of future en-route charges (see
CANSO Communication in April 2009 [Ref. 34]).
8.2.11 In May 2009, the European Commission requested Member States to provide the list of
the cost-containment measures for 2009 and 2010. A majority of States/ANSPs disclosed
this information for the purposes of the Enlarged Committee for Route Charges meeting
held in June 2009. This information is summarised in Figure 106 below, which makes a
distinction between genuine structural ANSPs measures aimed at containing or reducing
the cost-base (green columns) and temporary measures from the State/shareholder to
reduce charges33 (blue column).
Improved shift
planning
Enhanced
management of
overtime
Change pension
scheme for new
recruits
Increase retirement
age
Review staffing
needs for support
functions
Pay freeze for top
executives
Postpone recruitment
Curtail travel
Postpone training
Review property
needs. Sell surplus
assets.
Improved
procurement
processes
Extend life of
technical systems
Review investment
plan
ATCO
productivity
ATCO
employment
costs
Other
operating
costs
Capitalrelated
costs
Critical review of plans
Critical review of operational processes
Rationalise ACCs and other operational units
Across-the-board areas of improvement for ANSPs
Seek improvements through cooperation
(FABs)
More rigorous budgetary control
ANSP seeks
additional revenue for
inadequately funded
services
State funds specific
elements of the cost
base
Use stabilisation fund
or other reserves to
smooth unit rate
fluctuations
Reduced requirement
for return on Stateowned
equity
Crosssubsidies
and
transfers
Figure 106: Summary of main cost-containment measures implemented by States
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Performance Review Report 2009(66)
