• 热门标签

当前位置: 主页 > 航空资料 > 国外资料 >

时间:2010-06-30 09:08来源:蓝天飞行翻译 作者:admin
曝光台 注意防骗 网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者

be under the control of that State. A detailed list of the top 50 most constraining points in
Europe can be found in Annex VI.
16 It should be noted that, in many cases, the shortest route even if not planned is already given on a tactical basis by
Air Traffic Control. Improvements in “route utilisation” could reduce potential improvements in “ATC Routing”.
PRR 2009 Chapter 5: Operational En-route Performance
57
5.4.3 Particularly with a view to the setting of binding performance targets within the SES
performance scheme it is important to note that the use of national flight efficiency targets
is influenced by the dependency of the route structure on adjacent States. It furthermore
highlights the importance of the development of a Pan-European network improvement
plan in collaboration with States/FABs.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Within State TMA interface State Interface
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
France
Germany
UK
Italy
Spain
Turkey
Greece
Belgium
Switzerland
Netherlands
Austria
Poland
Sweden
Romania
Czech
Cyprus
Serbia &
Ukraine
Ireland
Bulgaria
Hungary
Denmark
Portugal
Norway
Croatia
Canary
Slovak
FYROM
Finland
Bosnia-
Slovenia
Albania
Malta
Moldova
Additional distance/Great Circle distance (%)
Source: PRC Analysis
Additional distance (million kilometres)
Figure 70: Additional en-route distance per State in 2009
5.5 Access to and use of shared airspace
5.5.1 Access is one of the ICAO key performance areas. This
section focuses on access to shared airspace by military
and civil users.
5.5.2 In order to meet the increasing needs of both
stakeholders in terms of volume and time, a close
civil/military co-operation and co-ordination across all
ATM-related activities is key to maximising the use of
scarce airspace.
Shared airspace
“Shared” is AMC17 manageable
Special Use Airspace (SUA) that
consists of individual airspace
volumes and opening times and can
be used alternatively for civil traffic
and military activities. It is no longer
designated as either military or civil
airspace, but considered as one
continuum and used flexibly on a
day-to-day basis.
5.5.3 From a civil point of view, the benefit of access to shared airspace is improved en-route
flight efficiency (see previous section). From a military viewpoint, access to shared
airspace enables military training programmes. The shared airspace should be located in
proximity to airbases in order to optimise transit times to the training areas.
5.5.4 The PRC report “Evaluation of Civil/Military airspace utilisation” in 2007 [Ref. 20]
raised two main points:
 for States to increase their commitment to design and implement appropriate routes
and sector configurations to improve the utilisation of shared airspace particularly
during weekends, and
 to establish a performance measurement system for the utilisation shared airspace.
17 Airspace Management Cell.
PRR 2009 Chapter 5: Operational En-route Performance
58
5.5.5 In order to facilitate civil/military coordination and to support a more consistent crossborder
implementation of the flexible use of airspace (FUA) planning process,
EUROCONTROL has launched a number of initiatives such as LARA18, CIMACT19 and
PRISMIL.20
5.5.6 Of particular relevance is the need to ensure that airspace is used when made available
particularly when the shared airspace is temporarily segregated either for military or civil
airspace users.
5.5.7 Although there is virtually no
military activity during
weekends, only a small
reduction of direct route
extension can be observed, as
shown in Figure 71.
5.5.8 Although a gradual
improvement of direct route
extension is visible between
2004 and 2009, the gap
between week and weekend
remains stable.
0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Direct route extension
Week Days Week End
Figure 71: Direct route extension -week/weekend
5.5.9 In terms of performance measurement there was further progress in 2009 and PRISMIL
KPIs are now available for Belgium, France and Germany.
5.5.10 Figure 72 shows performance indicators for Belgium, France, and Germany collected
within PRISMIL to help evaluate and improve the use of shared airspace. The indicators
 
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:Performance Review Report 2009(46)