曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
Figure 107: ANSPs balance sheet structure, 2008 .........................................................................91
Figure 108: Liquidity ratios per ANSP, 2008 ................................................................................92
xvi
Figure 109: Trend in en-route ANS real unit costs for the five largest States (2004-2013) in €2008
...............................................................................................................................................95
Figure 110: Changes in planned en-route costs and traffic for the five largest States (€2008)......96
Figure 111: Changes in planned en-route costs and traffic for the five largest States versus the
remaining 25 States (€2008)...................................................................................................98
Figure 112: Breakdown of en-route ANS costs at European system level (2008).........................98
Figure 113: Changes in en-route MET costs at European level (2004-2010) in €2008.................99
Figure 114: Arrangements for provision of MET services.............................................................99
Figure 115: Share of en-route MET costs in total en-route national cost base (2008).................100
Figure 116: EUROCONTROL Agency costs relative to total European en-route ANS costs.....100
Figure 117: EUROCONTROL Agency costs per establishment & expenditure (Parts I & IX) ..101
Figure 118: EUROCONTROL costs forward-looking projections (Nov. 2008- Nov. 2009) ......101
Figure 119: Status of 2008 terminal ANS data provision ............................................................102
Figure 120: Breakdown of terminal ANS costs at European system level (2008) .......................103
Figure 121: Terminal ANS unit costs at European system level (€2008) ....................................103
Figure 122: Terminal IFR ANS costs per IFR airport movement, 2008 ......................................104
Figure 123: Breakdown of gate-to-gate ATM/CNS provision costs (2008) ................................105
Figure 124: Changes in ATM/CNS provision costs, traffic and ATFM delays (2004-2008) ......106
Figure 125: ATM/CNS cost-effectiveness comparisons, 2004-2008 (real terms) .......................107
Figure 126: Breakdown of changes in cost-effectiveness, 2004-2008 (real terms)......................108
Figure 127: Perspectives on ANS performance ...........................................................................111
Figure 128: Estimated costs of ATFM delay ...............................................................................112
Figure 129: Estimated costs of sub-optimal horizontal flight efficiency .....................................113
Figure 130: Total economic en-route costs ..................................................................................114
Figure 131: Real unit economic en-route cost..............................................................................114
Figure 132: Evolution of en-route ATFM delays, unit costs and traffic ......................................115
Figure 133: FDPS system upgrades and planned replacements ...................................................117
Chapter 1: Introduction
PRR 2009 Chapter 1: Introduction
1
PART I- BACKGROUND
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the report
1.1.1 Air Navigation Services (ANS) are essential for the safety, efficiency and sustainability
of civil and military aviation, and to meet wider economic, social and environmental
policy objectives.
1.1.2 This Performance Review Report (PRR 2009) has been produced by the independent
Performance Review Commission (PRC) of EUROCONTROL. The PRC and its
supporting Unit the Performance Review Unit (PRU) were established in 1998 and have
been conducting performance review, target-setting and cost-effectiveness benchmarking
since then.
1.1.3 The purpose of this report is to provide policy makers and ANS stakeholders with
objective information and independent advice concerning European ANS performance in
2009, based on research, consultation and information provided by relevant parties.
1.1.4 The draft final report was made available to stakeholders for consultation and written
comment from 23 February-19 March 2010. The PRC considered every written comment
received and amended the Final Report where warranted.
1.1.5 The PRC’s recommendations can be found in the Executive Summary.
1.2 Structure of the report
1.2.1 PRR 2009 is structured as follows:
Executive Summary
Part I: Background
Introduction (Chapter 1)
Traffic demand (Chapter 2)
Part II: Key Performance Areas
Safety (Chapter 3)
Operational Performance
Air Transport Network Performance (Chapter 4)
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：Performance Review Report 2009(14)
