2.3 Monitoring of the effectiveness of the maintenance programme(s)
(This paragraph should set out a procedure to periodically review that the effectiveness of the maintenance programme is actually analysed as defined in Part 1.)
2.4 Monitoring that all maintenance is carried out by an appropriate maintenance organisation
(This paragraph should set out a procedure to periodically review that
Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
175
Section 2 CAR M
the approval of the contracted maintenance organisations are relevant for the maintenance being performed on the operator's fleet. This may include feed back information from any contracted organisation on any actual or contemplated amendment, in order to ensure that the maintenance system remains valid and to anticipate any necessary change in the maintenance agreements.
If necessary, the procedure may be subdivided as follows:
a.
Aircraft maintenance
b.
Engines
c.
Components)
2.5 Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the contract, including sub-contractors used by the maintenance contractor
(This paragraph should set out a procedure to periodically review that the continuing airworthiness management personnel are satisfied that all contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the contract. This may include a procedure to ensure that the system allows all the personnel involved in the contract [including the contractors and his subcontractors] to be acquainted with its terms and that, for any contract amendment, relevant information is dispatched in the organisation and at the contractor.)
2.6 Quality audit personnel
(This paragraph should establish the required training and qualification standards of auditors. Where persons act as a part time auditor, it should be emphasized that this person must not be directly involved in the activity he/she audits.)
PART 3 - CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE
3.1 Maintenance contractor selection procedure
(This paragraph should explain how a maintenance contractor is selected by the continuing airworthiness management organisation. Selection should not be limited to the verification that the contractor is appropriately approved for the type of aircraft, but also that the contractor has the industrial capacity to undertake the required maintenance. This selection procedure should preferably include a contract review process in order to insure that:
- the contract is comprehensive and that no gap or unclear area remains,
- every one involved in the contract [both at the continuing airworthiness management organisation and
Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
176
Section 2 CAR M
at the maintenance contractor] agrees with the terms of the contract and fully understand his responsibility.
- that functional responsibilities of all parties are clearly identified.
- is signed by the owner/lessee of the aircraft in the case of non-commercial air transport.
In the case of non commercial air transport, this activity should be carried in agreement with the owner.)
3.2 Quality audit of aircraft
(This paragraph should set out the procedure when performing a quality audit of an aircraft. It should set out the differences between an airworthiness review and quality audit. This procedure may include:
- compliance with approved procedures;
- contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the contract;
- continued compliance with CAR-M. )
PART 4 AIRWORTHINESS REVIEW PROCEDURES
4.1 Airworthiness review staff
(This paragraph should establish the working procedures for the assessment of the airworthiness review staff. The assessment addresses experience, qualification, training etc. A description shall be given regarding the issuance of authorisations for the airworthiness review staff and how records are kept and maintained.)
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS CAR -M(97)
