4.
When extensive maintenance has been carried out, it is acceptable for the certificate of release to service to summarise the maintenance so long as there is a unique cross-reference to the work-pack containing full details of maintenance carried out. Dimensional information should be retained in the work-pack record.
5.
The person issuing the certificate of release to service should use his normal signature except in the case where a computer release to service system is used. In this latter case , the DGCA will need to be satisfied that only the particular person can electronically issue the release to service. One such method of compliance is the use of a magnetic or optical personal card in conjunction with a personal identity number (PIN) known only to the individual, which is keyed into the computer. A certification stamp is optional.
6.
the completion of all maintenance, owners, certifying staff, operators and maintenance organisations should ensure they have a clear, concise, legible record of the work performed.
Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
7. In the case of an M.A.801 (b) 2 release to service, certifying staff should retain all records necessary to prove that all requirements have been met for the issuance of a certificate of release to service.
AMC M.A.801 (e) Aircraft certificate of release to service
1.
Being unable to establish full compliance with sub-paragraph M.A.801 (b) means that the maintenance required by the aircraft owner or M.A. Subpart G organisation could not be completed due either to running out of available aircraft maintenance downtime for the scheduled check or by virtue of the condition of the aircraft requiring additional maintenance downtime.
2.
The aircraft owner or M.A. Subpart G organisation is responsible for ensuring that all required maintenance has been carried out before flight. Therefore an aircraft owner or
M.A. Subpart G organisation should be informed and agree to the deferment of full compliance with M.A. 801(b). The certificate of release to service may then be issued subject to details of the deferment, including the aircraft owner or M.A. Subpart G organisation authorisation, being endorsed on the certificate.
3. If a certificate of release to service is issued with incomplete maintenance a record should be kept stating what action the mechanic, supervisor and certifying staff should take to bring the matter to the attention of the relevant aircraft owner or M.A. Subpart G organisation so that the issue may be discussed and resolved with the aircraft owner or
M.A. Subpart G organisation.
AMC M.A.801 (f) Aircraft certificate of release to service
‘Hazard seriously the flight safety’ means any instance where safe operation could not be assured or which could lead to an unsafe condition. It typically includes, but is not limited to, significant cracking, deformation, corrosion or failure of primary structure, any evidence of burning, electrical arcing, significant hydraulic fluid or fuel leakage and any emergency system or total system failure. An airworthiness directive overdue for compliance is also considered a hazard to flight safety.
AMC M.A.802 Component certificate of release to service
When an approved organisation maintains an aircraft component for use by the organisation a CA Form 1 may not be necessary depending upon the organisation’s internal release procedures, however all the information normally required for the CA Form 1 should be adequately detailed in the certificate of release to service.
AMC M.A.803 Pilot-owner authorization
1.
The pilot–owner should hold a valid pilot license issued or validated by a D.G.C.A for the aircraft type being maintained.
2.
Privately operated means the aircraft is not operated pursuant to M.A.201 (h) and (i).
3. A pilot owner should only issue a certificate of release to service for maintenance Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS CAR -M(72)
