1.5 Analysis of the effectiveness of the maintenance programme
(this paragraph should show what tools are used in order to analyse the efficiency of the
maintenance programme, such as:
-PIREPS,
-air turn-
Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
171
backs
-spare consumption,
-repetitive technical occurrence and defect,
-technical delays analysis [through statistics if relevant],
-technical incidents analysis [through statistics if relevant], -etc... The paragraph should also indicate by whom and how these data are analysed, what is the
decision process to take action and what kind of action could be taken. This may include:
-amendment of the maintenance programme,
-amendment of maintenance or operational
procedures,
-etc..)
1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy
(This paragraph should specify how the non-mandatory modification information are processed through the organisation, who is responsible for their assessment against the operator's/owner’s own need and operational experience, what are the main criteria for decision and who takes the decision of implementing [or not] a non-mandatory modification)
1.7 Major repair modification standards
(This paragraph should set out a procedure for the assessment of the approval status of any major modification before embodiment. This will include the assessment of the need of an Agency or design organisation approval. It should also identify the type of approval required, and the procedure to follow to have a modification approved by the DGCA or design.)
1.8 Defect reports
a) Analysis
(This paragraph should explain how the defect reports provided by the contracted maintenance organisations are processed by the continuing airworthiness management organisation. Analysis should be conducted in order to give elements to activities such as maintenance programme evolution and non mandatory modification policy.)
b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities
(Where a defect report shows that such defect is likely to occur to other aircraft, a liaison should be established with the manufacturer and the certification DGCA, so that they may take all the necessary action.)
c) Deferred defect policy
(Defects such as cracks and structural defect are not addressed in the MEL and CDL. However, it may be necessary in certain cases to defer the rectification of a defect. This paragraph should establish the procedure to be followed in order to be sure that the deferment of any defect will not lead to any safety concern. This will include appropriate liaison with the manufacturer.)
Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
172
1.9 Engineering activity
(Where applicable, this paragraph should expose the scope of the organisation’s engineering activity in terms of approval of modification and repairs. It should set out a procedure for developing and submitting a modification/repair design for approval to the DGCA and include reference to the supporting documentation and forms used. It should identify the person in charge of accepting the design before submission to the DGCA.
Where the organisation has a DOA capability under CAR 21, it should be indicated here and the related manuals should be referred to.)
1.10 Reliability programmes
(This paragraph should explain appropriately the management of a reliability programme.
It should at least address the following:
-extent and scope of the operator's reliability programmes,
-specific organisational structure, duties and responsibilities,
-establishment of reliability data,
-analysis of the reliability data,
-corrective action system (maintenance programme amendment),
-scheduled reviews (reliability meetings, the participation of the DGCA.)
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS CAR -M(95)
