曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
Where the sub-contracted organisation develops its own procedures these should be compatible with the operator's continuing airworthiness management exposition and the terms of the contract. These should be accepted by CAD as extended procedures of the operator and as such should be cross-referenced from the continuing airworthiness management exposition. One current copy of the sub-contracted organisation's relevant procedures should be kept by the operator and should be accessible to CAD where needed.
Note: Should any conflict arise between the sub-contracted organisation’s procedures and those of the operator then the policy and procedures of the continuing airworthiness management exposition will prevail.
The contract should also specify that the sub-contracted organisation’s procedures may only be amended with the agreement of the operator. The operator should ensure that these amendments are compatible with their continuing airworthiness management exposition and in compliance with MCAR-M Subpart G.
The operator should nominate who will be responsible for continued monitoring and acceptance of the sub-contracted organisation procedures and their amendments. The controls used to fulfill this function should be clearly set out in the amendment section of the continuing airworthiness management exposition detailing the level of operator involvement.
Whenever any elements of continuing airworthiness management tasks are sub- contracted the operator's continuing airworthiness management personnel should have access to all relevant data in order to fulfill their responsibilities.
Note: The operator retains authority to override where necessary for the continuing airworthiness of their aircraft, any recommendation of the sub-contracted organisation.
The operator should ensure that the sub-contracted organisation continues to have qualified technical expertise and sufficient resources to perform the subcontracted tasks while in compliance with the relevant procedures. Failure to do so may invalidate the approval of the operators continuing airworthiness management system.
The contract should provide for CAD monitoring.
The contract should address the respective responsibilities to ensure that any findings arising from CAD monitoring will be closed to the satisfaction of CAD.
2. ACCOMPLISHMENT
This paragraph describes topics, which may be applicable in such a sub-contract arrangements.
Scope of work
The type of aircraft and their registrations, engine types and/or component subject to the continuing airworthiness management tasks contract should be specified.
Maintenance programme development and amendment
The operator may sub-contract the preparation of the draft maintenance programme and any subsequent amendments. However, the operator remains responsible for assessing that the draft proposals meet his needs and obtaining CAD approval; the relevant procedures should specify these responsibilities. The contract should also stipulate that any data necessary to substantiate the approval of the initial programme or an amendment to this programme should be provided for operator agreement and/or CAD upon request.
Maintenance programme effectiveness and reliability
The operator should have in place a system to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the maintenance programme based on maintenance and operational experience. The collection of data and initial assessment may be made by the sub-contracted organisation; the required actions are to be endorsed by the operator.
Where reliability monitoring is used to establish maintenance programme effectiveness, this may be provided by the sub-contracted organisation and should be specified in the relevant procedures. Reference should be made to the operators approved maintenance programme and reliability programme. Participation of the operator’s personnel in reliability meetings with the sub-contracted organisation should also be specified.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
马尔代夫民航法规 MCAR-M Continuing Airworthiness(98)
