曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
advertisement in a daily newspaper of general circulation in the areas affected by the action. The
agency also must provide 30 days for written public comment prior to taking any formal actions
on the draft determination. This comment period may be concurrent with any other public
involvement, such as that which occurs in the NEPA process.
A notice of the final Conformity Determination must be provided to the required recipients and
placed by prominent advertisement in a daily newspaper of circulation in the areas affected by
the action within 30 days of the final Conformity Determination
The Conformity Determination may be included in the Environmental Impact Statement for an
action. However, the determination must be issued prior to issuance of an agency FONSI or
Record of Decision.
A-7
Attachment A-1
REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Request Control Symbol
RCS:
INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent: Section II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function. Continue on
separate sheets as necessary. Reference appropriate item number (s).
SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION
1. TO (Environmental Planning Function) 2. FROM (Proponent organization and
functional address symbol)
2a. Telephone No.
3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION
4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (Identify decision to be made and need date)
5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVE (DOPAA) (Provide sufficient detail for evaluation of the total action.)
6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) 6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE
SECTION II - PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY. (Check appropriate box and describe
potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect: O = no effect: - = negative
effect: U = unknown effect)
+ O - U
7. AIR INSTALLATION COMPATIBLE USE ZONE/LAND (Noise, accident potential, encroachment, etc.)
8. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, attainment status, state implementation plan, etc.)
9. WATER RESOURCES (Quality, quantity, source, etc.)
10. SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (Asbestos/radiation/chemical exposure, explosives safety
quantity-distance, etc.)
11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)
12. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodlands, flora, fauns, etc.)
13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Native American burial sites, archeological, historical, etc.)
14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal., installation Restoration Program,
seissmicity, etc.)
15. SOCIOECONOMIC (Emolevment/ population projections, school and local fiscal imposts, etc.)
16. OTHER (Potential impacts not addressed above.)
SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINIATION
17. PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CATEX) ______________: OR
PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CATEX: FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED
18. REMARKS
19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION
CERTIFICATION (Name and Grade)
19a. Signature 19b. Date
AF FORM 813. AUG 93 (ED-V1) (PerFORM PRO) THIS FORM CONSOLIDATES AF FORMS 813 AND 814
PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF BOTH FORMS ARE OBSOLETE
PAGE 1 OF PAGE(S)
A-8
Appendix B: Project Reviewer’s Check List
B-2
B-3
Appendix B: Project Reviewer’s Check List
CONTENTS
B1 OVERVIEW ________________________________________________________5
B1.1 Projection Definition / Inventory of Emissions _______________________________ 5
B1.2 Indirect Source Review __________________________________________________ 5
B1.3 Transportation Conformity_______________________________________________ 5
B1.4 General Conformity _____________________________________________________ 5
B1.5 NAAQS Analysis________________________________________________________ 7
B-4
B-5
Appendix B: Project Reviewer’s Check List
B1 OVERVIEW
This appendix contains a recommended check list for anyone reviewing the air quality analysis
of a proposed airport or air base project to follow. In the following checklist, any references to
“airport” means any airport or air base and a “project” means a Federal airport or air base action,
unless specified otherwise (e.g., for military air base projects only).
B1.1 Projection Definition / Inventory of Emissions
1. Was the project scope adequately defined (project impact on fleet mix and
aircraft operations, possible increases in airside/landside congestion, need for
additional GSE, parking lot expansions, and similar changes) ?
2. Were state and local air quality agencies and the EPA contacted for coordination
on the air quality analysis?
3. Were all recommended project alternatives appropriately defined and
considered?
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Air Quality Handbook航空质量手册(69)
