曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
During 2002, a multinational Working Group was
established to develop harmonised, technically
and operationally robust contingency measures
for 12 civil and military Air Traffic Services (ATS)
units in the 4-States Area to cover catastrophic
outages of individual units within the region. The
Working Group started in January 2002 and
delivered a General Plan in March 2002, identifying,
for example, the resources required to take
over control of sectors from neighbouring ATS
units in the case of catastrophic failure and how
this could be managed. The project is planned
to continue in 2003.
2000 2001 2002
21/6 4/6 30/6 21/6 5/9 15/7 20/6 4/7 27/9 27/9 12/7 12/6
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
3,873
1,890
1,733
1,352
3,869
1,923
1,670
1,324
3,770
1,880
1,648
1,231
2000 2001 2002
July July July Oct July July July July July July July July
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
108,367
54,240
46,123
34,067
111,994
54,858
49,369
36,555
111,592
55,999
48,267
35,788
2000 2001 2002
6.7% 5.2% 8.3% 8.1% 1.1% 0.6% 4% 3% -1.2% -0.6% -2.3% -1.4%
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
1,184,739
590,258
496,322
380,922
1,197,512
594,068
516,036
392,398
1,182,601
590,379
503,928
386,719
Meeting demand: traffic levels
In 2002, the Maastricht Centre managed
1,182,601 flights. This represents a traffic
decrease of 1.2% over 2001. The peak
day was 27 September, when 3,869 flights
were processed through the Centre's
airspace.
The total number of minutes of delay
decreased by 64.8% over 2001.
The average delay per flight decreased
from 2.08 minutes in 2001 to 0.74 minutes
(or 44.5 seconds) in 2002.
The average delay per delayed flight
decreased from 18 minutes in 2001 to 14
minutes while the percentage of delayed
flights decreased from 11.66% to 5.17%.
In terms of the spread of traffic in the
Centre抯 airspace, 40% of the traffic load
was handled by the Brussels sector
group; 34% by the Hanover sector group
and 26% by the Deco (Delta/Coastal)
sector group. In terms of aircraft numbers,
the Brussels sector group handled
590,379 aircraft (a 0.6% decrease),
the Hanover sector group 503,928
(down 2.3% on 2001) and the Deco sector
group 386,719 ?a decrease of 1.4%.
Reducing delays has helped
customers
The Centre recorded an average capacity
growth of 14% to 15% for the peak summer
months. This was due mainly to three
factors: the introduction of RVSM, a larger
controller workforce and the introduction
of a fourteenth sector.
Daily traffic peaks
Hanover sector group
Deco sector group
Brussels sector group
MADAP (1)
Monthly traffic peaks
Annual traffic
(1) MADAP, the Maastricht Automatic Data Processing and
Display System, is a powerful fully automated data processing
system which collects, stores and processes all the information
required, providing a reliable, real-time synthetic picture of the
air traffic situation.
48 - 49 I Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre
CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT:
MAKING REAL GAINS
A new capacity plan
A new capacity manager was appointed
at the beginning of 2002 and a new
capacity enhancement plan (2003-2007)
was drawn up.
At the same time, the Centre is also planning
to improve its operating efficiency.
During 2002, the Centre reduced the
overall costs of its services ?air navigation
service provision costs and delay
costs ?by 25%, from EUR 191.7 million
to EUR 143.5 million. An analysis of the
capacity performance, set against
resources spent during 2002, has shown
the Centre is working close to its
搊ptimum operating point??the best
balance between the cost of air
navigation service provision and delays.
Based on current planning, AFTM delays
produced by the Centre aim to remain
below 1 minute per flight throughout the
next five years, with further delay reductions
of up to 0.25 minutes probable by
Summer 2007, by which time the optimum
operating point should have been reached.
Evolution of traffic from 1990-2002
Delays evolution over the past 3 years
400,000 115,000
Minutes Flights
110,000
105,000
100,000
95,000
90,000
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
EUROCONTROL Annual Report 2002(25)
