2.
For level 2 findings, the competent authority shall grant a corrective action period appropriate to the nature of the finding that shall not be more than three months. In certain circumstances, at the end of this first period and subject to the nature of the finding, the competent authority can extend the three month period subject to a satisfactory corrective action plan.
(b)
Action shall be taken by the competent authority to suspend in whole or part the approval in case of failure to comply within the timescale granted by the competent authority.
AMC M.B.605 (a)(1) Findings
For a level 1 finding it may be necessary for the competent authority to ensure that fur-ther maintenance and re-certification of all affected products is accomplished, dependent upon the nature of the finding.
ED 2010/002/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart F
EC 1056/2008
M.B.606 Changes
(a)
The competent authority shall comply with the applicable elements of the initial approval for any change to the organisation notified in accordance with point
M.A.617.
(b)
The competent authority may prescribe the conditions under which the approved maintenance organisation may operate during such changes, unless it determines that the approval should be suspended due to the nature or the extent of the chang-es.
(c)
For any change to the maintenance organisation manual:
1.
In the case of direct approval of changes in accordance with point M.A.604(b), the competent authority shall verify that the procedures specified in the manual are in compliance with this Annex (Part-M) before formally notifying the approved organisation of the approval.
2.
In the case an indirect approval procedure is used for the approval of the changes in accordance with point M.A.604(c), the competent authority shall ensure
(i)
that the changes remain minor and
(ii)
that it has an adequate control over the approval of the changes to ensure they remain in compliance with the requirements of this Annex (Part-M).
AMC M.B.606 Changes
1.
Changes in nominated persons
The competent authority should have adequate control over any changes to person-nel specified in M.A.606 (a) and (b). Such changes will require an amendment to the manual.
2.
It is recommended that a simple manual status sheet is maintained which contains information on when an amendment was received by the competent authority and when it was approved.
3.
The competent authority should define the minor amendments to the manual which may be incorporated through indirect approval. In this case a procedure should be stated in the amendment section of the maintenance organisation manual.
Changes notified in accordance with M.A.617 are not considered minor.
For all cases other than minor, the applicable part(s) of the EASA Form 6F should be used for the change.
4. The approved maintenance organisation should submit each manual amendment to the competent authority whether it be an amendment for competent authority approval or an indirectly approved amendment. Where the amendment requires competent authority approval, the competent authority when satisfied, should indi-cate its approval in writing. Where the amendment has been submitted under the indirect approval procedure the competent authority should acknowledge receipt in writing.
ED 2008/013/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart F
M.B.607 Revocation, suspension and limitation of an approval
The competent authority shall:
(a)
suspend an approval on reasonable grounds in the case of potential safety threat, or;
(b)
suspend, revoke or limit an approval pursuant to M.B.605.
AMC M.B.701 (a) Application
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(9)
