The paragraph should also indicate by whom and how these data are analysed, what is the decision process to take action and what kind of action could be taken. This may include:
-amendment of the maintenance programme,
-amendment of maintenance or operational procedures,
-etc...)
1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy
(This paragraph should specify how the non-mandatory modification information are processed through the organisation, who is responsible for their assessment against the operator’s/owner’s own need and operational experience, what are the main criteria for decision and who takes the decision of implementing [or not] a non-mandatory modifica-tion)
1.7 Major repair modification standards
(This paragraph should set out a procedure for the assessment of the approval status of any major modification before embodiment. This will include the assessment of the need of an Agency or design organisation approval. It should also identify the type of approval required, and the procedure to follow to have a modification approved by the Agency or design organisation.)
1.8 Defect reports
a) Analysis
(This paragraph should explain how the defect reports provided by the contracted maintenance organisations are processed by the continuing airworthiness management organisation. Analysis should be conducted in order to give elements to activities such as maintenance programme evolution and non mandatory modification policy.)
b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities
(Where a defect report shows that such defect is likely to occur to other aircraft, a liaison should be established with the manufacturer and the certification competent authority, so that they may take all the necessary action.)
c) Deferred defect policy
(Defects such as cracks and structural defect are not addressed in the MEL and CDL. However, it may be necessary in certain cases to defer the rectification of a defect. This paragraph should establish the procedure to be followed in order to be sure that the deferment of any defect will not lead to any safety concern. This will include appropriate liaison with the manufacturer.)
1.9 Engineering activity
(Where applicable, this paragraph should expose the scope of the organisation’s engin-eering activity in terms of approval of modification and repairs. It should set out a pro-cedure for developing and submitting a modification/repair design for approval to the Agency and include reference to the supporting documentation and forms used. It should identify the person in charge of accepting the design before submission to the Agency or the competent authority.
Where the organisation has a DOA capability under Part 21, it should be indicated here and the related manuals should be referred to.)
1.10 Reliability programmes
(This paragraph should explain appropriately the management of a reliability pro-gramme. It should at least address the following:
-extent and scope of the operator’s reliability programmes,
-specific organisational structure, duties and responsibilities,
-establishment of reliability data,
-analysis of the reliability data,
-corrective action system (maintenance programme amendment),
-scheduled reviews (reliability meetings, the participation of the competent
authority.) (This paragraph may be, where necessary, subdivided as follows:) a) Airframe b) Propulsion c) Component
1.11 Pre-flight inspections
(This paragraph should show how the scope and definition of pre-flight inspection, that are usually performed by the operating crew , is kept consistent with the scope of the maintenance performed by the contracted maintenance organisations. It should show how the evolution of the pre-flight inspection content and the maintenance programme are concurrent, each time necessary.)
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(61)
