CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(13)

曝光台 注意防骗 网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者

the competent authority surveyor(s) should be satisfied that there is no reason to believe standards have deteriorated in respect of those specific item audits being granted a back credit;
d  the specific item audit being granted a back credit should be audited not later than 24 months after the last audit of the item.
5.  
When an operator sub-contracts continuing airworthiness management tasks all sub-contracted organisations should also be audited by the competent authority of operator at periods not exceeding 24 months (credits per paragraph 4 above are permitted) to ensure they fully comply with M.A. Subpart G. For these audits, the competent authority auditing surveyor should always ensure that he/she is accompa-nied throughout the audit by a senior technical member of the operator. All findings should be sent to and corrected by the operator.

6.  
When performing the oversight of organisations that hold both M.A. Subpart F and

M.A. Subpart G approvals, the competent authority should arrange the audits to cover both approvals avoiding duplicated visit of a particular area.
ED 2008/013/R ED 2008/013/R ED 2008/013/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart G

M.B.705 Findings
(a)
When during audits or by other means evidence is found showing non-compliance to the Part-M requirement, the competent authority shall take the following actions:

1.  
For level 1 findings, immediate action shall be taken by the competent authority to revoke, limit or suspend in whole or in part, depending upon the extent of the level 1 finding, the continuing airworthiness management organisation approval, until successful corrective action has been taken by the organisation.

2.  
For level 2 findings, the competent authority shall grant a corrective action period appropriate to the nature of the finding that shall not be more than three months. In certain circumstances, at the end of this first period, and subject to the nature of the finding the competent authority can extend the three month period subject to a satisfactory corrective action plan.

 

(b)
Action shall be taken by the competent authority to suspend in whole or part the approval in case of failure to comply within the timescale granted by the competent authority.

AMC M.B.705 (a)(1) Findings
1.  
For a level 1 finding the competent authority should inform the owner/operator and the competent authority of any potentially affected aircraft in order that corrective action can be taken to ensure possible unsafe conditions on these aircraft are cor-rected before further flight.

2.  
Furthermore, a level 1 finding could lead to a non compliance to be found on an aircraft as specified in M.B. 303 (g). In this case, proper action as specified in M.B.303

(h) would be taken.
ED 2010/002/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart G

EC 1056/2008

M.B.706 Changes
(a)
The competent authority shall comply with the applicable elements of the initial approval for any change to the organisation notified in accordance with point

M.A.713.

(b)
The competent authority may prescribe the conditions under which the approved continuing airworthiness management organisation may operate during such chang-es unless it determines that the approval should be suspended due to the nature or the extent of the changes.

(c)  
For any change to the continuing airworthiness management exposition:

1.  
In the case of direct approval of changes in accordance with M.A.704(b), the com-petent authority shall verify that the procedures specified in the exposition are in compliance with this Annex (Part-M) before formally notifying the approved organisation of the approval.

2.  
In the case an indirect approval procedure is used for the approval of the changes in accordance with point M.A.704(c), the competent authority shall ensure
　
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(13)