M.A.901(g) certifying staff making the recommendation with sufficient notice so that
it may organise itself according to M.A.901 (j).
Furthermore, this part of the investigation should be carried out by appropriate air-worthiness review staff in accordance with M.B.902(b).
9. Only when satisfied the aircraft is airworthy, should the inspector issue an airworthi-ness review certificate.
ED 2008/013/R ED 2008/013/R
Section B
PART-M
Subpart I
EC 1056/2008
M.B.902 Airworthiness review by the competent authority
(a)
When the competent authority carries out the airworthiness review and issues the airworthiness review certificate EASA Form 15a (Appendix III), the competent author-ity shall carry out an airworthiness review in accordance with point M.A.710.
(b)
The competent authority shall have appropriate airworthiness review staff to carry out the airworthiness reviews.
1. For all aircraft used in commercial air transport, and aircraft above 2730 kg MTOM, except balloons, these staff shall have acquired:
(a)
at least five years experience in continuing airworthiness, and;
(b)
an appropriate licence in compliance with Annex III (Part-66) or a nationally recognized maintenance personnel qualification appropriate to the aircraft category (when Annex III (Part-66) refers to national rules) or an aeronautical degree or equivalent, and;
(c)
formal aeronautical maintenance training, and;
(d)
a position with appropriate responsibilities.
Notwithstanding the points “a” to “d” above, the requirement laid down in point M.B.902(b)1b may be replaced by five years of experience in continuing airworthiness additional to those already required by point M.B.902(b)1a.
2. For aircraft not used in commercial air transport of 2730 kg MTOM and below, and balloons, these staff shall have acquired:
(a)
at least three years experience in continuing airworthiness, and;
(b)
an appropriate licence in compliance with Annex III (Part-66) or a nationally recognized maintenance personnel qualification appropriate to the aircraft category (when Annex III (Part-66) refers to national rules) or an aeronautical degree or equivalent, and;
(c)
appropriate aeronautical maintenance training, and;
(d)
a position with appropriate responsibilities.
Notwithstanding the points “a” to “d” above, the requirement shown in point M.B.902(b)2b may be replaced by four years of experience in continuing airworthi-ness additional to those already required by point M.B.902(b)2a.
(c)
The competent authority shall maintain a record of all airworthiness review staff, which shall include details of any appropriate qualification held together with a sum-mary of relevant continuing airworthiness management experience and training.
(d)
The competent authority shall have access to the applicable data as specified in points M.A.305, M.A.306 and M.A.401 in the performance of the airworthiness review.
(e)
The staff that carries out the airworthiness review shall issue a Form 15a after satis-factory completion of the airworthiness review.”
AMC M.B.902 (b) Airworthiness review by the competent authority
1.
A person qualified in accordance with AMC M.B.102 (c) subparagraph 1.5 should be considered as holding the equivalent to an aeronautical degree.
2.
“experience in continuing airworthiness” means any appropriate combination of experience in tasks related to aircraft maintenance and/or continuing airworthiness management (engineering) and/or surveillance of such tasks.
3.
An appropriate licence in compliance with Annex III (Part-66) is a category B or C licence in the subcategory of the aircraft reviewed. It is not necessary to satisfy the recent experience requirements of Part 66 at the time of the review or to hold the type rating on the particular aircraft.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(15)
