(1)
ignition source prevention and
(2)
flammability reduction,
ii) The major accidents related to fuel tank systems, the accident investigations and their conclusions,
iii) SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA Interim Policy INT POL 25/12: ignition prevention pro-gram initiatives and goals, to identify unsafe conditions and to correct them, to systematically improve fuel tank maintenance),
iv) Explain briefly the concepts that are being used: the results of SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA INT/POL 25/12: modifications, airworthiness limitations items and CDCCL,
v) Where relevant information can be found and how to use and interpret this infor-mation in the various instructions for continuing airworthiness (aircraft mainten-ance manuals, component maintenance manuals…),
vi) Fuel Tank Safety during maintenance: fuel tank entry and exit procedures, clean working environment, what is meant by configuration control, wire separation, bonding of components etc,
vii) Flammability reduction systems when installed: reason for their presence, their effects, the hazards of an Flammability Reduction System (FRS) using nitrogen for maintenance, safety precautions in maintenance/working with an FRS,
viii) Recording maintenance actions, recording measures and results of inspections.
The training should include a representative number of examples of defects and the associated repairs as required by the TC / STC holders maintenance data.
F) Approval of training
For M.A. Subpart G approved organisations the approval of the initial and continua-tion training programme and the content of the examination can be achieved by the change of the CAME exposition. The modification of the CAME should be approved as required by M.A. 704(b). The necessary changes to the CAME to meet the content of this decision should be made and implemented at the time requested by the competent authority.
Appendix XIII to AMC M.A.712 (f)
Organisational reviews may replace a full quality system in accordance with the provisions of M.A.712 (f) and AMC M.A.712 (f) and as described in the continuing airworthiness management exposition (CAME)
Depending on the complexity of the small organisation (number and type of aircraft, number of different fleets, privilege to perform airworthiness reviews, etc.), the organisa-tional review system may vary from a system using the principles and practices of a qual-ity system (except for the requirement of independence) to a simplified system adapted to the low complexity of the organisation and the aircraft managed.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(76)