曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
As a core minimum, the organisational review system should have the following fea-tures, which should be described in the CAME:
a. Identification of the person responsible for the organisational review programme:
By default, this person should be the accountable manager, unless he delegates this responsibility to (one of) the M.A.706(c) person(s).
b. Identification and qualification criteria for the person(s) responsible for performing the organisational reviews:
These persons should have a thorough knowledge of the regulations and of the continuing airworthiness management organisation (CAMO) procedures. They should also have knowledge of audits, acquired through training or through experi-ence (preferably as an auditor, but also possibly because they actively participated in several audits conducted by the competent authority).
c. Elaboration of the organisational review programme:
· Checklist(s) covering all items necessary to be satisfied that the organisa-tion delivers a safe product and complies with the regulation. All procedures described in the CAME should be addressed.
· A schedule for the accomplishment of the checklist items. Each item should be checked at least every 12 months. The organisation may choose to conduct one full review annually or to conduct several partial reviews.
d. Performance of organisational reviews:
Each checklist item should be answered using an appropriate combination of:
· review of records, documentation, etc.
· sample check of aircraft under contract.
· interview of personnel involved.
· review of discrepancies and difficulty internal reports (e.g., notified difficulties in using current procedures and tools, systematic deviations from procedures, etc.).
· review of complaints filed by customers.
e. Management of findings and occurrence reports:
· All findings should be recorded and notified to the affected persons.
· All level 1 findings, in the sense of M.A.716(a), should be immediately noti-fied to the competent authority and all necessary actions on aircraft in service should be immediately taken.
ED 2008/013/R ED 2008/013/R
· All occurrence reports should be reviewed with the aim for continuous improvement of the system by identifying possible corrective and preventive actions. This should be done in order to find prior indicators (e.g., notified difficulties in using current procedures and tools, systematic deviations from procedures, unsafe behaviours, etc.), and dismissed alerts that, had they been recognised and appropriately managed before the event, could have resulted in the undesired event being prevented.
· Corrective and preventive actions should be approved by the person respon-sible for the organisational review programme and implemented within a speci-fied time frame.
· Once the person responsible for the organisational review programme is sat-isfied that the corrective action is effective, closure of the finding should be recorded along with a summary of the corrective action.
· The accountable manager should be notified of all significant findings and, on a regular basis, of the global results of the organisational review programme.
Following is a typical example of a simplified organisational review checklist, to be adapted as necessary to cover the CAME procedures:
1 – Scope of work
· All aircraft under contract are covered in the Form 14.
· The scope of work in the CAME does not disagree with the Form 14.
· No work has been performed outside the scope of the Form 14 and the CAME.
· Is it justified to retain in the approved scope of work aircraft types for which
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(77)
