2.
The audit may be carried out on a product line type basis. For example, in the case of an organisation with Socata TB20 and Piper PA 28 ratings, the audit is concentrated on one type only for a full compliance check. Dependant upon the result, the second type may only require a sample check that should at least cover the activities identi-fied as weak for the first type.
3.
The competent authority auditing surveyor should always ensure that he/she is accompanied throughout the audit by a senior technical member of the organisation. The reason for being accompanied is to ensure the organisation is fully aware of any findings during the audit.
4.
The auditing surveyor should inform the senior technical member of the organisation at the end of the audit visit on all findings made during the audit.
AMC M.B.602 (e) Initial approval
1.
Findings should be recorded on an audit report form with a provisional categorisa-tion as a level 1 or 2. Subsequent to the audit visit that identified the particular find-ings, the competent authority should review the provisional finding levels, adjusting them if necessary and change the categorisation from ‘provisional’ to ‘confirmed’.
2.
All findings should be confirmed in writing to the applicant organisation within 2 weeks of the audit visit.
3. There may be occasions when the competent authority finds situations in the appli-cant’s organisation on which it is unsure about compliance. In this case, the organi-sation should be informed about possible non-compliance at the time and the fact that the situation will be reviewed within the competent authority before a decision is made. If the review concludes that there is no finding then a verbal confirmation to the organisation will suffice.
AMC M.B.602 (f) Initial approval (*)
1.
The audit report should be made on an EASA Form 6F (see appendix VI).
2.
A quality review of the EASA Form 6F audit report should be carried out by a compe-tent independent person nominated by the competent authority. The review should take into account the relevant paragraphs of M.A. Subpart F, the categorisation of finding levels and the closure action taken. Satisfactory review of the audit form should be indicated by a signature on the EASA Form 6F.
AMC M.B.602 (g) Initial approval
The audit reports should include the date each finding was cleared together with refer-ence to the competent authority report or letter that confirmed the clearance.
Section B
PART-M
Subpart F
* see Appendices to Part M – Appendix VI to AMC M.B.602(f)
M.B.603 Issue of approval
(a)
The competent authority shall issue to the applicant an EASA Form 3 approval cer-tificate (Appendix V) which includes the extent of approval, when the maintenance organisation is in compliance with the applicable paragraphs of this Part.
(b)
The competent authority shall indicate the conditions attached to the approval on the EASA Form 3 approval certificate.
(c)
The reference number shall be included on the EASA Form 3 approval certificate in a manner specified by the Agency.
AMC M.B.603 (a) Issue of approval
1.
For approvals involving more than one competent authority, the approval should be granted in conjunction with the competent authorities of the Member States in whose territories the other maintenance organisation facilities are located. For prac-tical reasons the initial approval should be granted on the basis of a joint audit visit by the approving competent authority and competent authorities of the Member States in whose territories the other maintenance organisation facilities are located. Audits related to the continuation of the approval should be delegated to the com-petent authorities of the Member States in whose territories the other maintenance organisation facilities are located. The resulting audit form and recommendation should then be submitted to the approving competent authority.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(7)
