AMC M.B.104 (f) Record-keeping
The cases, when records shall be made available should be limited to:
-incidents or accidents,
-findings through the aircraft continuing monitoring program where organisations
approved by another competent authority are involved, to determine the root cause, -aircraft mainly operated in another Member State, -an aircraft previously operated in another Member State -an organisation having approvals in several Member States When records are requested from another Member State, the reason for the request
should be clearly stated. The records can be made available by sending a copy or by allowing their consultation.
AMC M.B.105 (a) Mutual exchange of information
One typical case where the mutual exchange of information is necessary is when an air-craft is transferred inside the EU according to M.A.903. When notified of such a transfer, a competent authority should inform the competent authority where the aircraft will be registered of any known problems with the aircraft being transferred. Furthermore, the competent authority where the aircraft will be registered should ensure that the former competent authority has been properly notified that the aircraft is leaving
EC 1056/2008 EC 1056/2008
SUBPART C
CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS
M.B.301 Maintenance programme
(a)
The competent authority shall verify that the maintenance programme is in compli-ance with M.A.302.
(b)
Except where stated otherwise in point M.A.302(c) the maintenance programme and its amendments shall be approved directly by the competent authority.
(c)
In the case of indirect approval, the maintenance programme procedure shall be approved by the competent authority through the continuing airworthiness manage-ment exposition.
(d)
In order to approve a maintenance programme according to paragraph (b), the com-petent authority shall have access to all the data required in points M.A.302(d), (e) and (f).
AMC M.B.301 (a) Maintenance programme
For the competent authority of registry to verify compliance with M.A.302, the auditing surveyor/inspector should have received training on maintenance programme develop-ment and control.
AMC M.B.301 (b) Maintenance programme (*)
1.
When assessing aircraft maintenance programmes for approval, the competent authority should verify that the maintenance programme is acceptable for the contin-ued airworthiness of the specific aircraft listed and it is appropriate for the proposed operating environment and scheduled utilisation.
2.
The competent authority should assess the contents taking into account the origins of the document i.e. the manufacturers recommended maintenance programme, a MRB report, the operators own experience or another approved programme.
3.
A competent authority may elect to publish a proposed maintenance schedule for a piston engined aircraft type or a group of piston engined aircraft types below 2730Kgs maximum take off mass (MTOM) or for a sailplane, powered sailplane or balloon type or for a group of sailplanes, powered sailplanes or balloon types. When owners/operators of the aircraft mentioned above elect to use a competent authority proposed maintenance schedule, all the out of phase manufacturer recommenda-tions should be incorporated into the final maintenance programme in order for it to be approved.
4.
A copy of the approved programme should be retained by the competent authority, unless the programme is approved by a M.A. Subpart G approved organisation.
5.
The documentation issued by the competent authority to approve the operator’s maintenance programme may include details of who may issue certificates of release to service in a particular situation and may define which tasks are considered as com-plex maintenance tasks or limited pilot owner maintenance according to Appendix VIII to Part-M.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(4)
