曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
accreditation under the NAFEMS QSS which, in turn, forms the basis for accreditation under ISO 9000 when
companies perform finite element analyses.
The method has been validated against a number of applications in the aeronautical, nuclear, civil, off-shore and
defence industries. These examples of the SAFESA best practice method for qualifying structures by finite element
analyses are available as explicit demonstrations. The companies involved in the SAFESA consortium are,
therefore, able to deploy this method in a wide range of industrial environments.
For a more detailed description of the project’s results, see Safe structural analysis in Chapter 16.
References
The following documents:
[1] SAFESA Quick Reference Guide (Ref: R0039)
[2] SAFESA Management Guidelines (Ref: R0040)
[3] SAFESA Technical Manual (Ref: R0041)
are available from:
NAFEMS
Birniehill, East Kibride
Glasgow G75 0QU
Tel: 013552 72639
Project number: 9034 Approx. Project Cost: £1.6m Start date: Oct 1991 End date: Sep 1995
EPSRC Grant number: h12294
Advances in Safety Critical Systems - Results and Achievements from the DTI/EPSRC R&D Programme. Compiled and edited by Mike Falla.
28
Safe-SAM Safe System Architectures for Large Mobile Robots
Department of Engineering, Lancaster University
Department of Computing, Lancaster University
Contact: Mr D Seward
Department of Engineering
Lancaster University
Lancaster LA1 4SW
Tel:01524 593010
E-mail: D.Seward@lancaster.ac.uk
Objectives
To investigate safety issues that concern heavy mobile robots.
To study the implications of adopting a ‘safety manager’ approach to achieving system safety
To demonstrate a feasible architecture on an existing robot excavator.
To model the process of constructing a safety argument for a complex non-deterministic system.
For a description of the project’s results see section 3.5, Mobile robots, and section 15.2, An architecture for mobile
robots.
References
[1] Hazard Analysis Techniques for Mobile Construction Robots, D W Seward, D A Bradley and F W Margrave,
11th Int. Symp. on Robotics in Construction, Brighton, England pp 35- 42, May 94 (also + C).
[2] Establishing the Safety Argument for the Use of Programmable Electronics Systems in Transport, F W
Margrave and D W Seward, 27th International Symposium on Automotive Technology & Automation,
Aachen, Germany, publ Automotive Automation Limited, Croydon, ISBN 0 947719 678, pp 519-526, Nov
1994 (also + C).
[3] Safe Systems for Mobile Robots - The Safe-SAM Project, D Seward, F Margrave, I Sommerville and G
Kotonya, Achievement and Assurance of Safety, Ed Redmill and Anderson, 1995, ISBN 3-540-19922-5.
(also + C).
[4] LUCIE the Robot Excavator - Design for System Safety, D W Seward, F Margrave, I Sommerville and R
Morrey, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, U.S.A, Apr 1996
(also + C).
[5] System Architectures and Safety for Mobile Construction Robots, D W Seward, S Quayle, 13th Int. Symp. on
Robotics in Construction, Tokyo, Jun 1996 (also + C).
[6] Safe Systems Architectures for Autonomous Robots, I. Sommerville, D. Seward, R. Morey and S. Quayle,
Safer Systems: Proceedings of the Fifth Safety-critical Systems Symposium, Brighton 1997, Springer-Verlag,
ISBN 3-540-76134-9.
Project number: 9315 Approx. Project Cost: £0.2m Start date: Sep 1993 End date: Aug 1996
EPSRC Grant number: j18064
Advances in Safety Critical Systems - Results and Achievements from the DTI/EPSRC R&D Programme. Compiled and edited by Mike Falla.
29
SCIDSSafety Critical Systems Integrated Design Support
University Of Paisley
Uncles: York Software Engineering Ltd;
Rolls-Royce and Associates Ltd;
Oracle Ltd;
BMT Research Ltd.
Contact: Mr D G Jenkins
Computing And Information Systems
University Of Paisley
Paisley, Renfrewshire, Scotland
PA1 2BE
Tel: 0141 848 3546, E-Mail: dgj@paisley.ac.uk
Summary
The objectives of the SCIDS project were:
1 to provide an improved interface for the designer via Pen Computing;
2 to provide an open toolset framework based on the blackboard paradigm;
3 to provide access to a SCS toolset within the framework;
4 to capture design intent and safety arguments from the earliest stages of design;
5 to acquire unbiased design protocol from Design Challenges;
6 to research 'critics' which do not depend on intrusion into the designer's work;
7 to motivate the development of an open market in knowledge.
At the time of going to press, a version of the Online Design Journal has been implemented. Industry trends have
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
航空资料25(160)
