From one perspective, the ATM Project managerial frameworks which is ‘lightest’ in terms of reporting structure (there is no Project Steering Group), could be considered heaviest in terms of the responsibilities falling directly on the Terminal Airspace design team. One of the greatest advantages this type of managerial framework is, however, that it is usually possible for implementation time-scales to be decided only by the Terminal Airspace design team.
1
.
3
I
M
P
A
C
T
O
F
T
Y
P
E
D
I
F
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
S
1.3.1 IMPACT OVERVIEW
It is not surprising that the differences between managerial frameworks can be substantial in terms of the project planning.
In order to appreciate the impact of these differences, a tabular overview is provided below followed by para. 1.3.2 which introduces the impact of Type differences on Project Planning
– thus setting the scene for Chapter 2.
Note 1: Readers’ attention is drawn to the fact that some of these differences will become clearer after reading the remainder of the Chapters in Part B.
DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SAMPLE PROJECT ‘TYPES’
Terminal Airspace Project – Major Infrastructure project External Directive projects ATM Project
(1) …Initiated by Policy by (national or regional) government, realised by Project Steering Group Policy by (regional/municipal) government, or court ruling i.e. ‘external’ party ATM operational requirements/ User requirements identified by/submitted to the Terminal Airspace design team
(2) .. Management Structure decided by Project Steering Group Operational Manager or Terminal Airspace Design team Operational Manager or Terminal Airspace Design team
(3) …Implementation date selected by Project Steering Group in consultation with Policy makers, usually as a function of scope. Decided at policy level/court ruling i.e. external party, enforced by Operational Manager (or equivalent), (often) despite the scope. Decided by Terminal Airspace Design team as a function of Scope and objectives after scope and objectives set
(4) .. Strategic Scope & Objectives selected by Project Steering Group. ‘External’ party. Determined by the Terminal Airspace design team before deciding implementation date
(5) .. design objectives selected by Terminal Airspace Design Team Terminal Airspace Design Team Terminal Airspace Design Team
(6) Dependencies Project Steering Group, Operational Manager or Terminal Operational Manager or Terminal
with other projects Operational Manager (and Airspace Design Team Airspace Design Team
Identified by Terminal Airspace Design Team, at specialist level)
(7) Reference Scenario agreed by (Part C, Chapter 2) Terminal Airspace Design Team Terminal Airspace Design Team Terminal Airspace Design Team
(8) Safety and Terminal Airspace Design Team Terminal Airspace Design Team in Terminal Airspace Design Team in
Performance in accordance with Regulatory accordance with Regulatory-or accordance with Regulatory
Criteria selected by Requirements external requirements Requirements
(Part C, Chapter 3)
T
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
A
i
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：EUROCONTROL MANUAL FOR AIRSPACE PLANNING 1(110)
