曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
certain tanks, because of the fuel-transfer and usage-time variations, would exhibit any variance in
their long-term condition.
3.2 Scope
As one of the initiating manufacturers of the AFSSP, Airbus Industrie worked closely with other
manufacturers to define the scope of the program. Although the design and certification
requirements for fuel systems as a whole remain common between manufacturers, the
implementation of specific engineering solutions may be different. Within the Airbus Industrie
inspection program, therefore, there were some inspection items that were particular to Airbus as
well as some that were not included because Airbus does not use those particular design features.
3.2.1 Additional Activities
Airbus Industrie have ongoing activities with the local certifying aviation authorities that are
complimentary or supplementary to the AFSSP. These other activities are part of the continuous
airworthiness process. Where there were issues discovered during the AFSSP inspection program
that need an appropriate in-service action, the item was immediately transferred to the existing
continuous airworthiness process involving Airbus Industrie’s certifying authority.
3.3 Working Group Teams
The Airbus Airplane Working Group (AWG) make-up is based on its aircraft product line and
with each airline member representing each product where it had the most interest. There were
3.0 Airbus Working Group Report (continued)
Page 18 Industry AFFSP Report August 4, 2000
airlines within the Airbus AWG having all of the product line and hence provided the added
support in conducting inspections for all types.
3.3.1 Team Composition
Given the worldwide distribution of the Airbus fleet, there was a requirement to see if there were
any variations in tank condition according to the operating environment or any other regional
variances such as fuel quality.
The Airbus AWG had the appropriate worldwide coverage of operators who volunteered to be part
of the inspection definition process, and later to perform the inspections. The following flow chart
shows the Airbus working group organization and its composition.
3-1: Airbus Working Group Organization and Composition
The Technical Panel members in the AWG are either from the Airbus partner companies or
particular departments based in Toulouse headquarters. Their main function is to ensure that the
inspection criteria and documentation format meet the agreed common set of requirements set by
all the participating manufacturers and promulgated through the FSSLT.
Each In-Service Inspection Team had the task of scrutinizing each inspection document to ensure
its practicality before it was released for use in the field.
Airbus Working Group
Chair: Airbus Industrie
Co-chair: Lufthansa (all models)
Technical Panel In-Service Inspection Teams
Expertise covered:
Fuel Systems Design & Certification
Lightning Direct Effects
Lightning Indirect Effects
Fire Prevention
Electrical Engineering
Continue Airworthiness
Maintenance Engineering
Service Bulletins / Inspection Documentation
Structures Engineering
Electrical Installation
Fuel System Engineering Definition
Computer Services (Database)
W/B (A300B/A300-600/A310)
AIB In-Service Engineering
American Airlines
FedEx
Emirates Airlines
S/A (A319/A320/A321)
AIB In-service Engineering
Northwest Airlines
Dragonair
Swissair.
L/R (A330/A340)
AIB In-service Engineering
Air Canada
Cathay Pacific
Lufthansa
3.0 Airbus Working Group Report (continued)
August 4, 2000 Industry AFFSP Report Page 19
3.3.2 Team Activities
Regular meetings were held during the initial definition phase of the inspection program. The
Technical Panel had internal meetings to define the inspection criteria as agreed between all the
participating manufacturers. The Service Bulletin /Documentation department would then produce
a draft set of inspection documents for review within each of the product-line AWG sub-groups.
The inspections were carried out with one lead airline member within each product-line subgroup
to ensure validity and accuracy. An Airbus In-Service Support engineer would usually participate
to assist in performing the first aircraft inspection of each model type.
3.4 Working Group Approach
At the outset of the program, each manufacturer agreed on the basic premise that the inspections
must be sufficiently thorough without the potential for causing intrusive damage. In addition to
participating airlines, therefore, the Airbus AWG also involved some of the major fuel system
equipment suppliers. Where internal items could not be inspected, the fuel system component
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
航空资料3(67)
