EU 127/2010
(e)
The airworthiness review certificate (EASA Form 15b) or the recommendation for the issue of the airworthiness review certificate (EASA Form 15a) referred to in Appendix III to Annex I (Part-M) can only be issued:
1. by airworthiness review staff appropriately authorised in accordance with point
M.A.707 on behalf of the approved continuing airworthiness management organisation or by certifying staff in cases provided for in point M.A.901(g); and
2. when satisfied that the airworthiness review has been completely carried out and that there is no non-compliance which is known to endanger flight safety.
(f)
A copy of any airworthiness review certificate issued or extended for an aircraft shall be sent to the Member State of Registry of that aircraft within 10 days.
(g)
Airworthiness review tasks shall not be sub-contracted.
(h)
Should the outcome of the airworthiness review be inconclusive, the competent authority shall be informed as soon as practicable but in any case within 72 hours of the organisation identifying the condition to which the review relates.
AMC M.A.710 (a) Airworthiness review
1. A full documented review is a check of at least the following categories of documents:
-registration papers -M.A.305 aircraft continuing airworthiness record system -M.A.306 operator’s technical log system -list of deferred defects, minimum equipment list and configuration deviation list
if applicable.
-aircraft flight manual including aircraft configuration
-aircraft maintenance programme
-maintenance data
-relevant work packages
-AD status
-modification and SB status
-modification and repair approval sheets
-list of service life-limited component
-relevant EASA Form 1 or equivalent
-mass and balance report and equipment list
-aircraft, engine and propeller TC Data Sheets
As a minimum, sample checks within each document category should be carried out.
2. The M.A. Subpart G organisation should develop procedures for airworthiness review staff to produce a compliance report that confirms the above have been reviewed and found in compliance with Part-M.
AMC M.A.710 (b) and (c) Airworthiness review
1.
The physical survey could require actions categorised as maintenance (e.g. operation-al tests, tests of emergency equipment, visual inspections requiring panel opening etc.). In this case, after the airworthiness review a release to service should be issued in accordance with Part-M. When the airworthiness review staff are not appropriately qualified to Part-66 in order to release such maintenance, M.A.710(b) requires them to be assisted by such qualified personnel. However, the function of such Part-66 personnel is limited to perform and release the maintenance actions requested by the airworthiness review staff, it not being their function to perform the physical survey of the aircraft. As stated in M.A.710(b), the airworthiness review staff shall carry out the physical survey of the aircraft, and this survey includes the verification that no inconsistencies can be found between the aircraft and the documented review of records. This means that the airworthiness review staff who are going to sign the airworthi-ness review certificate or the recommendation should be the one performing both the documented review and the physical survey of the aircraft, it not being the intent of the rule to delegate the survey to Part-66 personnel who are not airworthiness review staff. Furthermore, the provision of M.A.710(d) allowing a 90 days anticipa-tion for the physical survey provides enough flexibility to ensure that the airworthi-ness review staff are present.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 1(61)
