航空资料6(77)

曝光台 注意防骗 网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者

Clamps
Wear
From
Plate
1 49 N,L Y N N 73 N,L N L L
2 56 L Y L L 80 N Y N N
3 68 N Y N N 92 N,L N L M
4 58 N N N N 82 N,L Y N N
5
6
7 0.438 0.409 0.029 61 N Y L M 85 N,L Y M L
9 0.5 0.44 0.06
10 0.375 0.331 0.044 53 N,L Y L L 77 N,L Y N N
11 0.375 0.331 0.044
Wire Code 9 Group IIF Fluid Group IIM Metal
With
Code
Clamp
Diameter
Bundle
Diameter
Diameter
Difference Bundle
Wear
From
Wire
DWV,
No.
Failed
Slip at
100
Hrs?
Wear
From
Clamps
Wear
From
Plate Bundle
Wear
From
Wire
DWV,
No.
Failed
Slip at
100
Hrs?
Wear
From
Clamps
Wear
From
Plate
C-21
1
2
3
4 70 L,N N N L 94 N,L N N L
5
6
7
9 0.5 0.47 0.03 60 M Y L L 84 N,L 2 Y S L
10 0.375 0.361 0.014 51 N N N M 75 N,L N N L
11 0.375 0.361 0.014
Key:
N = No N = None M = Moderate
Y = Yes L = Low S = Severe
TABLE C-12. GROUP II SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY WIRE TYPE (Continued)
Wire Code 10 Group IIF Fluid Group IIM Metal
With
Code
Clamp
Diameter
Bundle
Diameter
Diameter
Difference Bundle
Wear
From
Wire
DWV,
No.
Failed
Slip at
100
Hrs?
Wear
From
Clamps
Wear
From
Plate Bundle
Wear
From
Wire
DWV,
No.
Failed
Slip at
100
Hrs?
Wear
From
Clamps
Wear
From
Plate
1
2 57 N Y L N 81 N Y N M
3 50 L 3 Y S L 74 N Y L L
4 67 N Y L N 91 N Y L N
5
6
7 53 N Y N L 77 N,L Y N L
9 51 N N N L 75 N N N N
10 0.313 0.252 0.061 62 N Y N S 86 N,L Y M N
11 0.313 0.252 0.061 71 L,N Y N L 95 N,L 1 Y N L
Wire Code 11 Group IIF Fluid Group IIM Metal
With
Code
Clamp
Diameter
Bundle
Diameter
Diameter
Difference Bundle
Wear
From
Wire
DWV,
No.
Failed
Slip at
100
Hrs?
Wear
From
Clamps
Wear
From
Plate Bundle
Wear
From
Wire
DWV,
No.
Failed
Slip at
100
Hrs?
Wear
From
Clamps
Wear
From
Plate
C-22
1
2
3
4 55 N,L Y L L 79 L Y N N
5
6
7
9
10 71 L,N Y N N 95 N,L Y N N
11 0.313 0.252 0.061 59 N Y N M 83 N Y N M
Key:
N = No N = None M = Moderate
Y = Yes L = Low S = Severe
TABLE C-13. WIRE CRUSH TEST RESULTS
Load Applied Wire Damage Rating
(lb) Top Wire Code
Bottom
Wire Code
Wire
Code Most
Damaged Top Bottom
80 7 4 7 1 1
120 7 2 1
80 1 7 7 0 1
120 7 0 2
80 3 10 3 1 1
120 3 2 1
80 9 10 10 0 1
120 10 0 1
80 2 2 B2 1 1
120 B2 1 1
80 10 7 7 0 2
120 7 1 2
80 4 2 4 1 0
120 4 2 1
80 11 4 4 1 1
120 4 1 2
80 7 2 7 2 0
120 7 2 0
80 10 2 10 1 1
120 10 2 1
80 11 11 2 2
120 2 2
80 9 9 0 1
120 T9 0 1
80 7 7 1 1
120 1 1
80 10 10 1 1
120 2 2
80 4 1 4 1 0
120 4 1 1
80 3 2 3 2 0
120 3 2 1
80 4 4 1 1
120 1 1
80 4 3 3 1 1
120 3 1 2
80 10 4 4 1 1
120 4 1 1
C- 23
TABLE C-13. WIRE CRUSH TEST RESULTS (Continued)
Load Applied Wire Damage Rating
(lb) Top Wire Code
Bottom
Wire Code
Wire
Code Most
Damaged Top Bottom
80 7 3 7 1 1
120 7 2 1
80 3 3 1 1
120 2 2
80 9 4 4 0 1
120 4 1 2
80 11 10 11 2 2
120 11 2 2
80 1 1 1 1
120 1 1
* Wire Damage Ratings
0 – No damage
1 – Partially through insulation
2 – Completely through insulation to conductor
3 – Through conductor
C-24
APPENDIX D—ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
FIGURE D-1. SEVERE WIRE WEAR
FROM CLAMP IN GROUP I PTFE WIRE
NONMIXED BUNDLE
FIGURE D-2. SEVERE WEAR OF PTFE
AND PTFE/GLASS WIRES FROM
CLAMP IN GROUP I
FIGURE D-3. SEVERE WEAR OF
PTFE/GLASS WIRE FROM CLAMP IN
NONMIXED GROUP I BUNDLE
FIGURE D-4. SEVERE WEAR OF
MF-PTFE WIRE FROM CLAMP IN
GROUP I NONMIXED BUNDLE
FIGURE D-5. SEVERE WEAR OF
PTFE/GLASS AND MF-PTFE WIRES
FROM CLAMP IN GROUP I
FIGURE D-6. MODERATE WEAR OF
PI/PTFE ALLOY FROM CLAMP IN
GROUP I NONMIXED BUNDLE
　
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：航空资料6(77)