曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
systems employment of the F/A-18F aircraft except actual control of the aircraft. The WSO integrates
with the pilot to collectively achieve and maintain crew efficiency, situational awareness, and mission
effectiveness. When designated as mission commander, the WSO is also responsible for all phases of
the assigned mission.
28.4 AIRCREW RESPONSIBILITIES BY FLIGHT PHASE
28.4.1 Mission Planning and Briefing. All members of the flight should be involved in the mission
planning process and must be familiar with the mission requirements prior to the brief. The flight brief
shall be conducted with all members of the flight present. Any supporting assets (such as GCI, fighter
escort, EW, etc.) shall be briefed face-to-face, if possible. Flights requiring special coordination or
control should also be briefed face-to-face. Each type of flight or phase of flight may require unique
briefing requirements.
28.4.2 Pretakeoff. Aircraft discrepancy book (ADB) review, preflight, prestart, and poststart evolutions
are conducted individually with the aid of ground maintenance crews (plane captains, trouble
shooters, ordnance handlers, etc.). Timing must be considered when coordinating operations with other
activities. Marshalling and taxi as a flight should be in order with special emphasis on FOD avoidance.
A minimum taxi interval should be emphasized for FOD considerations. During section taxi the
wingman should not focus on other tasks or get behind.
28.4.3 Takeoff/Departure. The following should be considered and briefed when conducting a
formation takeoff in addition to the typical takeoff considerations such as gross weight, performance,
and abort capability:
· Interval for FOD avoidance
· Staggered line-up for abort
· Crosswind handling characteristics
· Jet exhaust/turbulence patterns
· Abort criteria and configuration changes prior to IMC
· Wingman positioning
· Airspeed
· Runway length/conditions
· Abort speed/procedures
Departure procedures are dependent upon weather and mission requirements.
The following are some considerations that may require crew coordination:
· Clearance compliance
· Climb schedule and interval of multi-plane formations
· Weather avoidance or penetration
· Individual departure to join on top
28.4.4 Enroute. Enroute procedures may differ greatly depending on mission requirements.
A1-F18EA-NFM-000
IX-28-3 ORIGINAL
28.4.5 Recovery. Egress, approach, and landing operations are numerous and dependent upon
mission objectives, weather, and types of landing. The following elements should be considered and
may require aircrew coordination:
· Navigation and communication systems management
· Course rules and re-entry procedures
· Approach and landing weather
· Landing type and capabilities (e.g., gross weight, crosswind limitations, asymmetry limitations,
etc.)
· Fuel for normal and alternate recoveries
· Formation size and composition based upon maneuverability and landing area congestion
· Instrument recovery/penetration procedures (single aircraft and/or formation)
· Power and maneuvering margins for wing men
· Jet wash and turbulence avoidance
· Terminal control/LSO procedures
· Landing interval and priorities
· FOD avoidance during landing and taxi
· De-arming procedures
28.4.6 Mission Critique. Mission assessment is critical following a flight whether the mission was a
multi-aircraft strike, an FCLP period, or a functional check flight. A critical and credible debrief of
mission effectiveness improves future mission success and enhances aircrew and supporting agency
coordination. A proper debrief should provide flight members and supporting agencies with information
on strengths and weaknesses so that future training and mission planning can focus on problem
areas and exploitation of strong areas.
28.5 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
28.5.1 Functional Checkflights. All requirements for functional checkflights are listed in
OPNAVINST 4790.2 (Series) and are to be performed using the applicable functional check flight
checklist. Crew coordination shall be in accordance with standard NATOPS procedures and apply
during the entire checkflight. F/A-18 NATOPS Chapter 10 outlines checks to establish acceptance
standards for the systems peculiar to the F/A-18E/F aircraft. All instrument and indicator readings,
warning lights, and radar and navigation displays in the rear cockpit shall be compared throughout the
flight with the corresponding information available from the front cockpit. Close crew coordination
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
NATOPS Flight Manual 飞行手册 2(121)
