• 热门标签

当前位置: 主页 > 航空资料 > 飞行资料 > 空客 >

时间:2011-11-26 18:03来源:蓝天飞行翻译 作者:航空

To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 9.0.124 or greater is installed.

曝光台 注意防骗 网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者

Types  CROSS-OVER altitude (average)  1st OPTIMUM FL (≤ ISA+10)  1st OPTIMUM FL (ISA+20) 
A300  26000 ft  300  280 
A310  27000 ft  330  310 
A319  29000 ft  370  340 
A320  29000 ft  360  340 
A321  29000 ft  340  310 
A330 GE  31000 ft  370  340 
A330 PW  31000 ft  370  360 
A330 RR  31000 ft  370  370 
A340  32000 ft  330  320 

Due to its particular climb speeds, the A340 cross-over altitude (well above the others) corresponds exactly to the first optimum FL for high take-off weights, whereas the optimum altitude is well above the cross-over altitude for all the other aircraft.
This leads us to consider the cost strategy case of the A340 in Section 6.3 herebelow because of its pre-eminent TAS advantage at cross-over altitude (around FL320).
On the other Airbus models this TAS advantage is never predominant compared to the accompanying fuel increment. This is due to the significant altitude difference (from 6000ft up to 9000ft) between optimum and cross-over altitude. By way of example we can indicate respectively the A320 and A330 families as consuming some 1000kg extra for a time gain of 5 to 8 minutes when climbing straight to the crossover altitude on typical and respective stage lenghts of 2000 and 3000 Nm.
In short, there is every reason for us to take the time factor into account in initial step climb management. The concern for fuel will receive priority thereafter.

To summarize this we can say that :

On models other than the A340, the OPT altitude being higher than the cross-over

altitude, the emphasis must immediately be placed on fuel economy (i.e, following scenario . from the outset even for the very first cruise flight level).


On the A340 models the OPT altitude being the same as the cross-over altitude, the emphasis should rather be placed on time economy as no real advantage can be gained from fuel economy until further into the flight.

 

6.3 Best cost strategy : A340 application
(a) Climb capability
In practice and contrary to some opinions, the A340 does climb straight to higher levels than its immediate competitor.
Europe

Source : EUROCONTROL
The following Table 9 provides a good approximation of optimum and maximum flight level for a Mach Number of 0.82 (< ISA +10).

Table 9. A340-311/CFM56-5C2
GROSS WEIGHT (t)  OPT FL  MAX FL (FMS) 
250  310  330 
230  330  350 
220  350  370 
200  370  390 
180  390  410 
170  410  410 (max certified) 

Optimum altitude is also a function of the cost index but its influence will only be significant for values in excess of 200 (see Figure 17).
 
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:getting to grips with the cost index(13)