.
Design APV Baro-VNAV final and missed approach segment
.
Design GBAS final and missed approach segment
.
Teaching points (from the evidence and assessment guide in competency framework )
.
GBAS OAS, basic surface, CRM
.
SBAS OAS
.
Extension of OAS
.
VSS
.
Baro VNAV surfaces
.
Intermediate and final segment connection
.
Straight-in missed approach
.
FAS data block
.
Data encoding
.
Waypoint coordinate calculation, resolution
.
Earth curvature impact
. Additional units
.
Airworthiness information
.
VNAV avionic information
.
Pilot point of view: Flight simulation in a flight simulator of the designed procedure
.
Assessment: Progress test and mastery tests administered as planned in course module plan.
Step 8: RECURRENT TRAINING
.
Goal: Maintain competency standards for newly developed procedure design features.
.
Description: Update knowledge according to each PANS-OPS (Doc 8168) amendment by following seminar / course / workshop, and by meeting procedure designers and sharing experiences.
Step 9: REFRESHER TRAINING
.
Goal: Maintain and upgrade skills and knowledge in accordance with competency framework.
.
Description: Update knowledge and strengthen skill after a long period of non application of specific criteria.
The Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design — Volume 2
ATTACHMENT B TO CHAPTER 3
TEST SELECTION CRITERIA
Type of Test Advantage(s) Disadvantage(s) S/K/As Tested Examples
Simulation (a) Real performance in simulated situation - Reduces consequence(s) of mistakes - Can create realistic dangerous situations - Reduces stress on trainees - Scoring may be subjective(rather bias) if the scoring key is not explicit enough All S/K/As (application and transfer of learned skills to novel situations) -Design straight departure non-RNAV procedure -Design omnidirectional departure RNAV procedure
(b) Simulated performance in simulated situation - Can create realistic portable and dangerous situation - No risk attendant on mistake - Little stress on trainees - Further removed from real conditions (validity?) All S/K/As (Except physical skills) -Case studies (varying degrees of complexity) o Identify best-practices for an en route procedure design o Recognize appropriate instruments for the design of VOR or NDB FAF procedure
The Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design — Volume 2
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：飞行程序设计质量保证手册(68)
