曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
3
Some missions of ANAC:
Improve aviation safety, security regulation and
inspections
Provide clear and stable regulations where necessary
Improve transparency and accountability
Simplify the Agency’s proceedings
Some priority targets of ANAC:
Maximize the efficiency of the airport infrastructure
Follow the best practices of the civil aviation agencies
around the world
METHODS TO INCREASE THE RUNWAY SAFETY LEVEL IN RESTRICTED AIRPORT SITES
4
The Air Transportation in Brazil:
Aerodromes: 3.500
Public: 750
Private: 2.750
Airports network: 67 (INFRAERO)
Air traffic: 97 %
Passengers in 2007: 110.000.000 (total)
Domestic: 89% International: 11%
São Paulo: 30% of Total
São Paulo Congonhas Airport: 13% domestic flights
São Paulo Guarulhos Airport: 17% dom./intl. flights
METHODS TO INCREASE THE RUNWAY SAFETY LEVEL IN RESTRICTED AIRPORT SITES
METHODS TO INCREASE THE RUNWAY SAFETY LEVEL IN RESTRICTED AIRPORT SITES
6
The São Paulo Congonhas Airport:
…is the busiest domestic airport in Brazil. The largest aircraft that
regularly use the runway are the Boeing 737-800 and the Airbus A320.
METHODS TO INCREASE THE RUNWAY SAFETY LEVEL IN RESTRICTED AIRPORT SITES
7
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
São Paulo Congonhas Airport
8
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
São Paulo Congonhas Airport
130m 1.750m 60m
Runway characteristics
60m 1.430m
9
Detailed Methodology:
Aircraft performance study was executed to determine
specify declared distances for TORA/ASDA/TODA/LDA;
The flight route limit of 1.500km was considered;
The variable used for aircraft performance analyses:
Payload: maximum passenger + cargo
(considering first passengers weight);
A comparative LDA study was elaborated for dry and wet
runway conditions to viability security operations
according recommended actions by ICAO Annex 14.
6
METHODOLOGY FOR DECLARED DISTANCES
170
Identify aircraft operations based on scheduled flights
no runway restrictions
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
11
Take-off analyses: The data was evaluated and
analyzed for take-off considering destination at 1,000 and
1,500km away.
For both routes was calculated the maximum passengers
and cargo load for each aircraft and flight destination
considering following conditions:
winds calm;
wet and dry runway;
temperatures between 16º and 32º Celsius;
TODA/TORA/ASDA: 1,640 and 1,790m runway length.
8
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
12
Example for Takeoff Analysis: Passenger (PAX)
1,000km flight - Boeing 737-800 SFP (short field performance)
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
13 Source: Software Flight Planning and Performance Manual, Boeing.
Example for Takeoff Analysis: PAX + CARGO
1,000km flight - Boeing 737-800 SFP
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
14
Example for Takeoff Analysis: PAX + CARGO
1,500km flight - Boeing 737-800 Short Field Performance
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
15
Take-off distances: TORA 1,790m + 150m of clearway, TODA = 1,940m
12
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
16
In takeoff operations at 17R, used 130m for takeoff and RESA will be 150m. ASDA
would be 130m + 1,660m = 1,790m
The same resulted for 35L, where: 60m + 1,730m = 1,790m for ASDA
13
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
17
Influence of LDA in total seats available
Landing analyses: The data was evaluated and analyzed for landing
considering runway 17R and aircraft from airports at 1,000 and 1,500km away.
14
Maximum: weekly seats available
Runway LDA length restrictions 1,640, 1,660, 1,730m considering wet runway.
Gap 1, Gap 2, Gap 3: seats reduction for airline-aircraft in total seats weekly available.
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
18
NOTE: Landing marks distance is
60m off runway, and RESA: 220m.
NOTE: Establish distance to
provide RESA: 150m, LDA:
1,660m for 17R
15
RUNWAY END SAFETY AREA: technical and operational applications
LDA 35R/17R
NOTE: ILS had not been dislocated
given the operational cost. The visual
aids continues originally indicate as
final landing slope.
1.660 m
1.660 m
220 m
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
航空资料23(109)
