曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
Enter EU peer reviews
The peer review process will be implemented
in 2010 to assist NSAs in improving
the performance of their role.
While it addresses all NSA arrangements
– both safety and non-safety
– the specific focus will initially be
on safety oversight processes, where
there are already detailed regulatory
provisions in the form of Regulation
(EC) No 1315/2007.
Peer reviews are expected to provide
new safety benefits, beyond
those provided by audit schemes.
Rather than duplicating existing programmes,
the process adopts a “teachand-
learn” approach, and is intended
to facilitate continuous improvement
and cooperation between NSAs. This
will be achieved by reviewing the
practical application of arrangements
and their performance, identifying
strong points, areas for improvements
and lessons learnt, thereby leading to
harmonisation of processes and identification
and sharing of best practices.
While the process brings added value,
it does not replace the audits of States/
NSAs, nor can it provide assurances
about the compliance of NSAs with
mandatory safety provisions.
In the medium
term, however, the
mechanism has
the potential to
effectively address
the continuous improvement of
NSA arrangements as part of the performance-
based approach introduced
by the Single European Sky second
package (SES II). In particular, the process
of developing FABs will benefit
from synergies and the sharing of best
practices among NSAs.
6
22
FOCUS
Peer review proces
The European Commission intends to
have peer reviews of all NSAs carried
out by the end of 2012 in the FAB context.
Peer reviews carried out on the
basis of FAB structures (i.e. 29 States
clustered in 9 FABs) bring benefits in
terms of capitalising on lessons learnt
and completing the activity within
the 2010-2012 time-frame. They are
also considered to be the most costefficient
and effective means of
achieving the objectives.
As certain FABs are composed of both
EU and non-EU States, the mechanism
could also be used as a tool to assist
the Community and its Member States
to support the extension of SES to
States which are not members of the
EU.
The Common Requirements set conditions
in terms of the minimum number
of reviewers in a peer review team.
Whilst the arrangements for the reviews
are a task for the EC, they are to
be conducted by national experts designated
by Member States. The EC has
therefore formally invited the NSAs to
nominate experts whose competence
should collectively cover all aspects of
the common requirements. To date,
the pool of experts numbers 64 NSA
staff.
The number of peer reviews has
been evaluated in the light of the
FAB implementation process, and
the approach being considered is
based on the following principles:
n The reviews of the NSAs involved
in an FAB will be conducted simultaneously.
They will not focus
on the FABs, but consider
the arrangements put in place,
irrespective of the maturity of
the approach to deal with a
FAB. For that purpose, the existing
arrangements of the NSAs
concerned will be reviewed and
compared, evaluating their potential
to evolve towards a set of
arrangements for the joint oversight
of the FAB.
n The review team visiting the NSAs
of a FAB will always come from outside
that FAB.
n For those FABs which include a
large number of States, the entire
scope of the exercise requires two
rounds of on-site visits.
The articulation of these principles
into a schedule allows all the groups
of NSAs associated with current FABs
to be covered, with 12 on-site visits
in a three-year period.
Implementation
The initial scope of the peer reviews
is essentially based on the results
from 28 ESIMS audits and two trial
reviews. It covers the main tasks
performed by NSAs as per Regulations
(EC) Nos 550/2004, 2096/2005
and 1315/2007, and focuses on NSA
human resources, interoperability,
oversight of changes and ongoing
compliance from the perspective of
certification renewal. The scope will
be widened in light of new tasks and
responsibilities for the NSAs under
SES II.
Eu peer reviews
Safety oversight capabilities
Conceptually, peer
reviews provide an
opportunity to review
the lessons learned
from safety audits and
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Skyway magazine(14)
