曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
54 Associate Professor Chris Winder, Evidence, 1 November 1999, p 8, see also AFAP, Evidence, 1 February 2000, p 113.
55 Associate Professor Chris Winder, Evidence, 1 November 1999, p 8
56 Associate Professor Chris Winder, Evidence, 1 November 1999, p 8
Additional joint toxicology studies by Mobil and a major manufacturer of TCP confirmed that an oil with 3% TCP could produce neurotoxic effects in animals administered very high oral doses. This led Mobil to adopt a very conservative labelling approach for its jet oils by including language recommending minimising exposure by all routes and emphasising the importance of good personal hygiene practices. The decision was made in the early part of 1997 and labelling was phased in during the year. …
Mobil's decision to label these products was based solely on its own policies and product safety stewardship practices. …
In summary, recent changes that have been made to the label and Material Safety Data Sheets do not reflect any underlying change in product composition or any new information about health hazards. Mobil Jet Oil 11 has been, and continues to be, safe for its intended purposes. The changes to the label were based solely on Mobil's own product stewardship practices and a very conservative approach to labelling, It must be emphasised that the revised labelling and MSDS statements do not reflect new information on Mobil Jet Oil II, suggesting hazard, where none exited before.57
3.55 Mr Plummer of Mobil Oil also told the inquiry:
… we resubmitted the basis for our labelling and that Mobil jet oil II is non-hazardous by Worksafe criteria to the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission. On 17 June last year we received their reply, agreeing that our labelling is correct and that Mobil jet oil II is correctly classified as non-hazardous.58
Development of a new Mobil jet oil
3.56 The inquiry was told by British Aerospace that trials are currently taking place in Australia and Europe to produce a Jet oil with different contents to those in Mobil Jet Oil II. Mr Black of British Aerospace noted:
“Though recognising that no firm scientific link has been made between the sick people and the contents of this oil, we have immediately launched an action to try to change to the oil which is claimed to not have these things in it.”59
and “We have never actually seen any of these dangerous chemicals getting through into the cabin. Nevertheless, due to that fact that those chemicals exist in the oil and that we have sick people at the other end of the chain, we have initiated this action to try to find a better oil which does not contain those constituents.” 60
57 Submission 13A, Mobil Oil Australia Ltd, pp 3-4
58 Mobil Oil Australia Ltd, Evidence, 1 February 2000, p 141
59 British Aerospace, Evidence, 2 November 1999, p 85
60 British Aerospace, Evidence, 2 November 1999, p 86
3.57 Mr Plummer of Mobil Oil told the inquiry his company has developed a new jet oil named jet oil 291. Mr Plummer advised that:
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Air Safety and Cabin Air Quality in the BAe 146 Aircraft(46)
