曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
working methods used under Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2006. With several other
Civil Aviation Authorities, i.e. those of ECAA countries and other former JAA Member States,
EASA signed working arrangements aiming, amongst other things, for the continuation of
standardisation activities based on the principles established under Commission Regulation
(EC) No 736/2006.
In the areas of Initial (IAW) and Continuing Airworthiness (CAW) the number of inspections
has remained stable (IAW: 13 versus 13) or increased compared to 2008 (CAW: 32 against 26).
The IAW domain confirms the status of the previous years, showing a satisfactory and uniform
level of understanding and implementation in all countries involved. In the CAW domain,
where all Member States exercise their competences, the uniform and proper implementation
of the rules still needs further efforts.
Whilst the number of non-conformity findings per number of inspection has slightly decreased
in IAW, it has increased in CAW. This is mainly due to specific regulatory opt-out provisions
which expired in September 2008 and in September 2009, causing some ill prepared Member
States to become non-compliant.
In 2009 EASA started to put more emphasis on a pro-active standardisation approach. In this
regard the direct involvement of national experts in EASA standardisation inspections has been
further promoted. Most of the competent authorities, including those of the newly associated
states, supported actively the process in its execution and in providing EASA with resources
for the standardisation teams. Another initiative by the Agency in support of a pro-active
standardisation approach was the organisation of Standardisation Meetings in each area. The
overall experience with these meetings was very positive.
A new concept, called ‘Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA)’, entailing a risk based planning
tool is under development that would allow to tailor the size of the teams, the scope, the
depth and the interval of standardisation inspection visits to identified risks, thereby optimizing
the process and use of resources.
44 European aviation safety agency
Annual Safety Review 2009
In the domain of training, EASA has launched an initiative open to all training managers
of the NAA to identify common qualification criteria and to satisfy common training needs for
all types of inspectors. This initiative is now consolidated in a permanent group, which meets
at regular intervals. The Agency is continuing to open its courses on EU regulations to all
NAA and to third countries’ authorities, in coordination with the International Cooperation
department of Rulemaking.
The organisation approvals activity in the domain of Design Organisations (DOA), Continuing
Airworthiness (- Maintenance) Organisations (CAO) and Production Organisations (POA)
has developed further in 2009. Despite of the global economic crisis, the number of initial
approvals has increased: the Agency now ensures surveillance of 254 Design Organisations and
223 Holders of Alternative Procedures to DOA inside and outside of Europe, 254 Maintenance
Organisations and 33 Maintenance Training Organisations outside Europe, 16 Production
Organisations outside Europe and the EASA Single Production Organisation Approval
of Airbus in Europe and China. All the listed activities have been performed by EASA staff,
supported by contracted European NAAs and partially seconded NAA staff in the DOA and POA
domain. In addition the Agency ensures the continued validity of 1303 EASA Maintenance
Organisations in the US and 148 EASA Maintenance Organisations in Canada, based on the
continuing surveillance of the FAA and Transport Canada.
The SAFA (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) activity was inherited from the JAA on
1 January 2007. The activity to be carried out by the Agency is a coordination function,
comprising the following elements: Maintaining the database of reports from SAFA ramp
inspections; providing analysis and reports on the collected data; fostering the organization
and implementation of training courses; providing proposals for manuals and procedures;
performing the standardization of SAFA activity.
In accordance with the established schedule (every 4 months), the Agency has performed the
SAFA quality review and the regular SAFA analysis which was distributed to all SAFA
participating states and the European Commission. In addition, on request of the European
Commission several ad-hoc analyses were conducted supporting various individual cases.
Following the SAFA regular analysis prioritization lists were compiled and distributed to all
National Coordinators in the SAFA participating states. The analysis of the SAFA data has
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
Annual Safety review 2009(13)
