∞
xrealistic(t)= an(t)cos(ntzΩ+ bn(t)) + w(t) (3.2)
n=0
∞
an(t)= Ak,ncos(ntΩ+ αk,n) (3.3)
k=0
∞
bn(t)= Bk,ncos(ntΩ+ βk,n) (3.4) k=0
Consequently, a gear vibration signature becomes a function of the am-plitude modulation amplitude matrix Ak,n, the amplitude modulation phase matrix αk,n, the phase modulation amplitude matrix Bk,n, and the phase modulation phase matrix βk,n. As the coe.cient values tend to drop o. quickly for increasing values of n and k, simpli.ed .nite-size approximations of these matrices can provide a good approximation of a gear vibration sig-nature.
According
to
[42],
any
presence
of
gear
failures
tends
to
increase
the
modulation between the meshing tone harmonics and low multiples of the shaft rotation. This corresponds to a value increase in the coe.cient matrix Ak,n for low values of k. Traditional condition indicators are designed to capture this phenomenon. Indicators do also exist which capture changes in the noise .oor w(t), which also is associated with certain types of damage.
3.3. FEATURE EXTRACTION
Overview
The indicator de.nitions presented here assume that the input signal is .nite, which is the case for all commercial HUMS. It is indeed possible to create indicator algorithms working on in.nite signals, but this topic is not treated in this study due to lack of relevance in the context of HUMS. The indicators explained here are only few examples of the total number existing in the literature, and only an extract of those are given an in-depth explanation.
Indicator Damage Detected Ref
IR Bearing inner race crack [35]
OR Bearing outer race crack [35]
BS Bearing roller crack [35]
Crest Factor General gear [10]
Energy Operator Localized gear [26]
Energy Ratio General gear [44]
FM0 General gear [42]
FM4 Localized gear [42]
Kurtosis Localized gear / bearing [39]
M6A Localized gear / bearing [28]
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:OPTIMIZATION OF FAULT DIAGNOSIS IN HELICOPTER HEALTH AND USA(20)