-0.5544 ]
0.0132
0.0463
0.0177 J
604 . PERFORMANCE, STABILITY, DYNAMICS, AND CONTROL
Basic System
-_ Full-StateFeedback
LongitudInal Full-State Feedback Design for GA Alrplana
8
d
<
. ...l
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━┓
┃ . ┃ ┃
┃ . ┃ ┃
┣━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━┫
┃37 ;-' . ┃ ll, ┃
┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┻━━━━━━┛
Fig. 635 Longitudinal response of the full-state feedback controller for the general
aviation airplane.
To verify the design, we have performed a simulation ofthe free response [r (t) =
OJ using MATLABI for the initial conditions Au - 5 deg, u - 0, 0 = q = 0. The
results are shown in Fig. 6.35. We observe that the system with full-state feedback
law performs as expected.
6.5.3 YawDamper
The purpose of the yaw damper is to generate a yawing moment that opposes
any yaw rate that builds up from an unstable Dutch-roll mode. However, this type
of control augmentation has one drawback.lt will oppose any steady-state yaw rate
the pilot wants to intentionally generate, for example, during a steady coordinated
levevi'turn. In this case the pilot will have to fight the yaw damper system. One
way of avoiding this problem is to use a wash-out circuit in the feedback loop.
The wash-out circuit will filter out all the steady-state components so that the yaw
damper system will not respond to steady-state yaw rates.
AFs7crr:pIe yaw damper with yaw rate feedbackis shown in Fig. 6.36. To illustrate
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:动力机械和机身手册3(86)