• 热门标签

当前位置: 主页 > 航空资料 > 飞行资料 > 空客 >

时间:2011-11-21 11:04来源:蓝天飞行翻译 作者:航空

To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 9.0.124 or greater is installed.

曝光台 注意防骗 网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者

As it is not allowed to modify manually the altitude constraints of the FMS vertical flight plan, the use of Baro-VNAV procedures is not permitted when the aerodrome temperature is lower than the published lowest temperature for the procedure (Source: PANS-OPS and TERPS) .
Note
However, a conventional RNAV approach (i.e., LNAV only) is permitted below  this temperature if :
A corresponding RNAV procedure (i.e. LNAV only) and corresponding MDA(H) is published; and,

The appropriate low-temperature correction is applied to all published altitudes (heights), by the pilot.


ICAO PANS-OPS does not provide altitude corrections for extreme high temperatures.
Note
When operating under extreme high temperature, the temperature effect on the true altitude may result in a steeper-than-anticipated flight-path angle / vertical speed when performing a constant-angle non-precision approach.
Operational and Human Factors Involved in Altimeter-setting Errors


The incorrect setting of the altimeter reference often is the result of one or more of  the following factors:
High workload;

Deviation from normal task sharing;

Interruptions and distractions; and,

Absence of effective cross-check and backup between crewmembers.


The analysis of incident / accident reports identify the following operational and human factors as causes of or contributing factors to altimeter-setting errors :
Incomplete briefings (i.e., failure to discuss the applicable altimeter-setting unit and the country practice for fixed or variable transitions altitudes / levels);

Workload during descent / approach;

Distraction / interruption;

Language difficulties (unfamiliar accents, speaking pace, unclear contraction of words, mixed English / local language communications, …);

Failure to cross-check altimeter-setting information (e.g., ATIS versus TWR messages, PF / PNF cross-check); 

Fatigue;

Confusion between altimeter-setting units (i.e., in.Hg or hPa);

Excessive number of instructions given by ATC in a single message;

Confusion between numbers such as 5 and 9 (i.e., if 9 is pronounced as nine instead of niner); and/or,

Incorrect listening associated with ineffective readback / hearback loop (refer to Flight Operations Briefing Note on Effective Pilot / Controller Communications).


Company Prevention Strategies and Personal Lines-of-Defense


Adherence to the defined task sharing (for normal or abnormal / emergency conditions) and the use of normal checklists are the most effective lines-of-defense against altimeter-setting errors.
Altimeter-setting errors often result in a lack of vertical situational awareness;  the following key points should be considered by pilots to minimize altimeter-setting errors and to optimize the setting of the barometric-altimeter MDA(H) / DA(H) or  radio-altimeter DH:
 
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址:Flight Operations Briefing Notes Supplementary Techniques Altimeter Setting - Use of Radio Altimeter(6)