曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
a) the two above-mentioned States;
b) each State whose citizens suffered fatalities or injuries;
c) each State whose citizens were detained as hostages;
d) each State whose citizens are known to be on board the
aircraft; and
e) the International Civil Aviation Organization.
5.2.6 Recommendation.— Each Contracting State
should ensure that information received as a consequence of
action taken in accordance with 5.2.2 is distributed locally to
the air traffic services units concerned, the appropriate airport
administrations, the operator and others concerned as soon as
practicable.
5.2.7 Recommendation.— Each Contracting State should
cooperate with other States for the purpose of providing a joint
response in connection with an act of unlawful interference.
When taking measures in their territory to free passengers and
crew members of an aircraft subjected to an act of unlawful
Annex 17 — Security Chapter 5
1/7/06 5-2
interference, each Contracting State should use, as necessary,
the experience and capability of the State of the Operator, the
State of manufacture and the State of Registry of that aircraft.
5.3 Exchange of information and reporting
5.3.1 Each Contracting State concerned with an act of
unlawful interference shall provide ICAO with all pertinent
information concerning the security aspects of the act of
unlawful interference as soon as practicable after the act is
resolved.
5.3.2 Recommendation.— Each Contracting State
should exchange information with other Contracting States as
considered appropriate on the management of response to an
act of unlawful interference, at the same time supplying such
information to ICAO.
ANNEX 17 ATT-1 1/7/06
ATTACHMENT TO ANNEX 17
CHAPTER 3. GENERAL RULES
. . . . . .
3.7 Unlawful interference
An aircraft which is being subjected to unlawful interference
shall endeavour to notify the appropriate ATS unit of this fact,
any significant circumstances associated therewith and any
deviation from the current flight plan necessitated by the
circumstances, in order to enable the ATS unit to give priority
to the aircraft and to minimize conflict with other aircraft.
Note 1.— Responsibility of ATS units in situations of
unlawful interference is contained in Annex 11.
Note 2.— Guidance material for use when unlawful
interference occurs and the aircraft is unable to notify an ATS
unit of this fact is contained in Attachment B to this Annex.
Note 3.— Action to be taken by SSR-equipped aircraft
which are being subjected to unlawful interference is
contained in Annex 11, the PANS-ATM (Doc 4444) and the
PANS-OPS (Doc 8168).
Note 4.— Action to be taken by CPDLC-equipped aircraft
which are being subjected to unlawful interference is
contained in Annex 11, the PANS-ATM (Doc 4444), and
guidance material on the subject is contained in the Manual of
Air Traffic Services Data Link Applications (Doc 9694).
. . . . . .
ATTACHMENT B. UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE
1. General
The following procedures are intended as guidance for use by
aircraft when unlawful interference occurs and the aircraft is
unable to notify an ATS unit of this fact.
2. Procedures
2.1 Unless considerations aboard the aircraft dictate
otherwise, the pilot-in-command should attempt to continue
flying on the assigned track and at the assigned cruising level
at least until able to notify an ATS unit or within radar
coverage.
2.2 When an aircraft subjected to an act of unlawful
interference must depart from its assigned track or its assigned
cruising level without being able to make radiotelephony
contact with ATS, the pilot-in-command should, whenever
possible:
a) attempt to broadcast warnings on the VHF emergency
frequency and other appropriate frequencies, unless
considerations aboard the aircraft dictate otherwise.
Other equipment such as on-board transponders and data
links should also be used when it is advantageous to do
so and circumstances permit; and
b) proceed in accordance with applicable special procedures
for in-flight contingencies, where such procedures have
been established and promulgated in the Regional
Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030); or
c) if no applicable regional procedures have been established,
proceed at a level which differs from the cruising
levels normally used for IFR flight by:
1) 150 m (500 ft) in an area where a vertical separation
minimum of 300 m (1 000 ft) is applied; or
2) 300 m (1 000 ft) in an area where a vertical separation
minimum of 600 m (2 000 ft) is applied.
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
附件17--防止对国际民用航空进行非法干扰行为的安全保卫(15)
