曝光台 注意防骗
网曝天猫店富美金盛家居专营店坑蒙拐骗欺诈消费者
2 These are for the NAAs the Advisory Group of National Authorities
(AGNA) and for the aviation industry the Safety Standards Consultative
Committee (SSCC).
Focus on EASA’s new regulatory tasks
© LFV/Tommy Säfström
Europea n Aviation Safety Agency EASANEWS 08
// Quick News / // Quick News / // Quick News //
Our first reader-friendly technical publication is
available for free download on the Technical Publications
page of the EASA website (http://www.easa.
europa.eu/ws_prod/g/technical-publications.php).
Further rules, as well as printed copies for sale, will
follow soon.
Consolidated
Part-M
Last October, the EU Council authorised the European
Commission to start negotiations on a Bilateral
Agreement between the EU and Brazil on
civil aviation safety. An EU delegation (composed
of representatives of the Commission and EASA)
met the Brazilian authorities in Brussels on 14-15
December 2009 to launch the first formal round
of negotiations. A draft executive Agreement and
an Annex on initial airworthiness were discussed.
Both delegations confirmed that the Agreement
should be built upon existing cooperation between
the Brazilian Aviation Authority (ANAC) and
EASA to cover, in the first place, issues of certification
of aeronautical products (design and production
– conditions of acceptance will be addressed
in detail in the relevant annex). Moreover, the
delegations agreed to expand their cooperation
on “safety initiatives” to ensure that they progressively
coordinate safety policies and initiatives,
exchange information and data, and develop joint
programmes. A provision in the draft agreement
establishes that the parties may agree to extend
the scope of cooperation to other areas. Additional
discussions on technical matters will be held in
Brazil on 1-2 March 2010 (second round of negotiations).
The Agreement could be signed during the
next EU-Latin America Aviation Summit planned in
Rio de Janeiro on 24-26 May 2010.
EU -Brazil:
Negotiation of a Bilateral Agreement
on civil aviation safety
Imprint
Publisher:
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Postfach 101253
D-50452 Cologne
Germany
Phone +49 221 8999 0000
Fax +49 221 8999 0999
www.easa.europa.eu
Editor-in-Chief:
Dr. Daniel Höltgen
Editor:
Savina Zakoula-Cherdron
Contributors to this issue:
EASA Safety Analysis team, Ula Loew, Yves
Morier, Robert Wiener, Sarah Poralla, Daniela
Defossar, Sergio Carpe Garcia
Layout:
804© GRAPHIC DESIGN, Düsseldorf Germany
For more information about this publication,
reactions or subscriptions please write to
easa.news@easa.europa.eu
Reprint with approval of publisher and
with reference to source only.
Copyright EASA for all imagery, unless
otherwise noted.
Published quarterly, release free of charge.
ISSN: 1831-3272
In response to a growing global concern about
the subject of pilot training following some highprofile
accidents, EASA Executive Director Patrick
Goudou called a one-day conference to debate the
subject. Nearly 200 delegates from across the industry
came together in Cologne on 24 November
2009. Key note speakers were Patrick Goudou and
the FAA Director of Flight Standards, John Allen.
Setting the context of the day, Patrick Goudou
pointed out the need for a constant review of training
given the growing complexity and automation
of modern aircraft. Fact is that today’s pilots have
less opportunities to manually fly the aircraft and
rules for training have not been amended significantly
over the last 60 years to face the new challenges.
While acknowledging the complexity of
the debate and that there was not a one size fits
all “silver bullet”, Mr. Goudou stressed that EASA
would engage with and facilitate pilot training initiatives
where needed.
Many strongly-held views about pilot training
priorities were voiced during the day. There was
consensus amongst all speakers that simply doing
more flying hours was not a solution to inexperience;
ultimately the selection of pilots was crucial to the desired
qualities of professionalism being displayed. All
parts of industry supported the IATA/ICAO initiative
on evidence-based training (ITQI), granting that it
would not completely replace prescriptive rules.
Looking ahead, Patrick Goudou concluded that
EASA, after having reviewed the Conference material,
would keep the debate alive. The High-Level
中国航空网 www.aero.cn
航空翻译 www.aviation.cn
本文链接地址：
EASA-Newsletter-issue-4(8)
